Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

"Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com> Fri, 18 October 2019 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52FE12003F for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGPZ7DW4GCE9 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnshjsmin03.nokia-sbell.com (cnshjsmin03.nokia-sbell.com [116.246.26.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7AB0120805 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: ac189297-d29ff70000006f83-27-5da909bee25c
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1606.nsn-intra.net (Unknown_Domain [135.251.51.106]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by cnshjsmin03.nokia-sbell.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 60.2E.28547.EB909AD5; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:39:26 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net (135.251.51.105) by CNSHPPEXCH1606.nsn-intra.net (135.251.51.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:39:25 +0800
Received: from CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net ([135.251.51.105]) by CNSHPPEXCH1605.nsn-intra.net ([135.251.51.105]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.007; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:39:25 +0800
From: "Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2
Thread-Index: AQHVg3fRwppu6xvn0kqBwx2bjn5c3qdcX5tQgACLRACAAnKOkIAAM0FQ
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:39:25 +0000
Message-ID: <a94b8accaf4941b18a278d656415447f@nokia-sbell.com>
References: <669DB111-6E71-4B8D-BD36-874FEB58F57C@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569980F5BCB819C731A2F463AE930@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <C3315C9C-C25E-4981-BDBC-A482158A13BE@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569976C5106BBBCE1CB1E259AE6D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB569976C5106BBBCE1CB1E259AE6D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2019-10-14T18:35:48.1737397Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=d7b68cfd-fc82-4729-a013-80ffb90d885d; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
x-originating-ip: [135.251.51.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a94b8accaf4941b18a278d656415447fnokiasbellcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrIIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXS/ts4S3cf58pYgykX+Cx+Hd/FYtG69xqj xfELvxkdmD2m/N7I6nFi2RVWjyVLfjIFMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZXzcO4utoGc3Y0XvVKEG xoNrGbsYOTkkBEwkelbuZ+1i5OIQEjjEJLHj5D8o5y+jxOVb75khnE2MEhv/fmYBaWETcJOY tG0XG0hCRKCHUaJt+hawWcICQRKLNz4FKuIASgRLHPqSDBIWAap/+XgF0CB2DhYBVYl9FiBR XgE7iWu7LkKNn8ok0dq0iA0kwSkQK3G17zcziM0oICbx/dQaJhCbWUBc4taT+UwQVwtILNlz nhnCFgUaD3I0yNBdrBITtkuDXCAhoCTRtwGqNVWi88Y1ZogSQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk6iwkZbOQ lEHEtSTmNfyGqlGUmNL9kB3C1pS4MvkQlK0tsWzha+YFjOyrGKWT84ozsopzM/MMjPXy8rMz E3WLk1JzcvSS83M3MQIjco3EpOk7GI8d8D7EKMDBqMTDeyB8RawQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEV7m KqAQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRmkOFiVx3pbJC2OFBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjGv26oqy eVe3rt+8wn3jud1LIowVNZP1nAy8nP74vb1S8HzTDwZ2N0t9sbcHFv3JuHzszstDLFsWFMZ9 PeNapXv5d0A273HmZavmLfu82v/HdQuJ+XlFwdP+b02VnvOM+Vdcp8w5papn976+29LEkqDB pXw9864IU/u8R40CG3/p50tNW7CFo0WJpTgj0VCLuag4EQAdwxxoxAIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EUdez-Fas-IGnediVYnhwDjoPRY>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:39:36 -0000

I think also including END.T which will select specific FIB,  and  the 4291-style IPv6 address may be in last SID entry in Last SRH of Packet, other SID may not be rfc429-style IPv6@;

--------------------------------------
Cheers !


WANG Weibin

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
Sent: 2019年10月18日 5:33
To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com>om>; SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Pablo,

I see your point. An RFC 4291-style IPv6 address can replace END with USD, but it can’t replaced END.X with USD.

                                                            Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 5:45 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>; SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Hi Ron,

Are you sure you get the same behavior with an interface address?

Can you please explain me how do you decapsulate and forward the inner -encapsulated- IPv6 packet on a link with a high IGP metric when the packet arrives with a DA=IPv6 interface address?

Thanks,
Pablo.

From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>
Date: Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 01:59
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Pablo,

You haven’t answered my question.

Why specify a USD flavor of END, END.X and END.T when you can get the exact same behavior by populating SID[0] with an IPv6 address that identifies a real interface?

USD seems redundant.

                                        Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 12:45 PM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>; SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Ron,

The USD flavour is used in any T.Encaps policy applied within the SR domain.

Cheers,
Pablo.

From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Tuesday, 15 October 2019 at 01:03
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Authors,

Sorry, I meant to say USD, not USP.

                         Ron




Juniper Business Use Only
From: Ron Bonica
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 2:36 PM
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Subject: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming :Section 4.16.2

Authors,

The USP flavor of the END, END.X and END.T functions isn’t needed.

USP is the default IPv6 behavior. So, if the source node specifies SID[0] as an RFC 4291 address on the SR egress node, you get the USP behavior for free.

                                                           Ron



Juniper Business Use Only