[spring] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8402 (7546)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 19 June 2023 05:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3957BC151086 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXjBZ3owZetl for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F62C14CF13 for <spring@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1F96C289D7; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, ginsberg@cisco.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com, robjs@google.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, bruno.decraene@orange.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jmh@joelhalpern.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: pravkum4@cisco.com, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230619051128.1F96C289D7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 22:11:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/GOWTZIUxJrJzh3Ujc41ZoFxLxls>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 23:35:54 -0700
Subject: [spring] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8402 (7546)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 05:11:32 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8402,
"Segment Routing Architecture".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7546

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Praveen Kumar <pravkum4@cisco.com>

Section: 1

Original Text
-------------
The active segment is indicated by the Destination Address (DA) of the packet.
The next active segment is indicated by the SegmentsLeft (SL) pointer in the SRH.

Corrected Text
--------------
Not sure of the exact corrected text but I feel SegmentsLeft (SL) pointer denotes the active segment, not the next active segment.

Notes
-----
SL is the active segment

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8402 (draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Segment Routing Architecture
Publication Date    : July 2018
Author(s)           : C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Source Packet Routing in Networking
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG