[spring] The status of SRCOMP analysis draft

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Tue, 08 June 2021 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982313A319C; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id andaO-61IGRF; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FCA3A31A9; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app12-12012 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eec60bf767f2c5-faf5e; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:54:08 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eec60bf767f2c5-faf5e
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee160bf767e424-34b08; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:54:08 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee160bf767e424-34b08
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: srcomp@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:54:07 +0800
Message-ID: <0e1d01d75c6d$c0b75530$4225ff90$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0E1E_01D75CB0.CEDA9530"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AddcbcAPns0dz2FFS9CrUT3OEdTXDw==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/H1RtrpSvvDUDdWciBWVQGMGZdHQ>
Subject: [spring] The status of SRCOMP analysis draft
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 13:54:33 -0000

Hi Chairs and Group,

At the last IETF meeting, the SRCOMP design team planed to release a full
version of the analysis draft by the end of May. 

Due to some chapters took longer time, we had two weeks delays. 

Recently, We've made a lot of progress, and we expect to post the full
version of analysis draft by end of this week.

According to the requirements draft[1], the analysis document will provide
some detailed analysis and comparison for four compression drafts,
including: C-SID[1], CRH[2], vSID[3], UIDSID[4]. 

The design team hopes this information will help speed up the standard




[3] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-24.txt

[4] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-decraene-spring-srv6-vlsid-04.txt

[5] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mirsky-6man-unified-id-sr-08.txt




Weiqiang Cheng