[spring] Re: spring Charter Update (charter-ietf-spring)

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

On September 5, 2024 at 10:57:33 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote:

Hi Greg!

> thank you for sharing the proposed updates to the SPRING charter. It all
> looks good to me. I have a minor proposal to the extend the list of the
> topics on which SPRING collaborates and coordinates adding the following:
> IPPM on performance measurement methods and metrics

After thinking about this, I'm inclined to cut the list instead of expanding it.

Yes, you're right, the WG does interact with ippm.  It also interacts
with pim (on p2mp segments); rift (for example) is in the process of
rechartering to include (among other things) SR extensions -- so maybe
we should include them too.  I'm sure there are others -- and I'm also
sure we will forget someone.

Instead of trying to be exhaustive, we should list the *required*
groups we have to coordinate with.  Here's the proposed text:


OLD>
   The SPRING WG will coordinate and collaborate with other WGs as
   needed. Specific expected interactions include (but may not be
   limited to):

   mpls on the MPLS data plane and associated extensions
   6man on the IPv6 data plane and associated extensions
   lsr on OSPF and IS-IS extensions
   idr on BGP extensions
   bess on VPN control plane
   pce on extensions for centralized solutions
   teas on traffic engineering architecture
   rtgwg on fast-reroute technologies
   srv6ops on SRv6 operations


NEW>
   The SPRING WG is expected to coordinate and collaborate closely
   with the following WGs:

   mpls on the MPLS data plane and associated extensions
   6man on the IPv6 data plane and associated extensions
   srv6ops on SRv6 operations

   As needed, the WG will also collaborate with other WGs to develop
   extensions and other SR-related solutions.


Thoughts?

Thanks!

Alvaro.