[spring] Deborah Brungard's Abstain on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-08: (with COMMENT)
"Deborah Brungard" <db3546@att.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 22:27 UTC
Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2941812D0CC; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160412222730.32190.87882.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:27:30 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Harrru-_sofwDpmXT3yInU6idBI>
Cc: pifranco@cisco.com, aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Deborah Brungard's Abstain on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:27:30 -0000
Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-08: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my Discuss and improving Section 3.3. I still find the various comparisons on using a distributed approach vs. a centralized controller as lacking in accuracy and a poor justification for SPRING. Just say simply you do not want to use a distributed control plane. This is not the first time that IETF had this requirement for one of their data planes. I won't block publication, so my "Abstain" position.
- [spring] Deborah Brungard's Abstain on draft-ietf… Deborah Brungard