[spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8402 (7546)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 19 June 2023 14:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFDEC1519B7; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.84, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJ250mSqaPw7; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722D2C15108C; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 29F0E119FA; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: pravkum4@cisco.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, ginsberg@cisco.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com, robjs@google.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: james.n.guichard@futurewei.com, iesg@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230619141220.29F0E119FA@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 07:12:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/MAo48-7NLeJbZCUitm_5oHtC5Bc>
Subject: [spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8402 (7546)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:12:24 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8402, "Segment Routing Architecture". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7546 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Praveen Kumar <pravkum4@cisco.com> Date Reported: 2023-06-19 Rejected by: James Guichard (IESG) Section: 1 Original Text ------------- The active segment is indicated by the Destination Address (DA) of the packet. The next active segment is indicated by the SegmentsLeft (SL) pointer in the SRH. Corrected Text -------------- Not sure of the exact corrected text but I feel SegmentsLeft (SL) pointer denotes the active segment, not the next active segment. Notes ----- SL is the active segment --VERIFIER NOTES-- I am rejecting this errata as https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8200#section-4.4 says “Number of route segments remaining, i.e., number of explicitly listed intermediate nodes still to be visited before reaching the final destination.”. In my opinion, the existing text for RFC 8402 is accurate based on the quoted text of RFC 8200. -------------------------------------- RFC8402 (draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Segment Routing Architecture Publication Date : July 2018 Author(s) : C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Source Packet Routing in Networking Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [spring] [Errata Rejected] RFC8402 (7546) RFC Errata System