[spring] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 13 December 2017 17:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases@ietf.org, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, spring-chairs@ietf.org, stephane.litkowski@orange.com, spring@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151318655848.30126.12687786142370669333.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:35:58 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/NNeo94VV3UhC7FVqFejpyQxOiCc>
Subject: [spring] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I *think* I found a minor issue. Section 5 contains the following text:

   Usually, in a normal routing protocol operations, microloops do not
   last long enough and in general they are noticed during the time it
   takes for the network to converge.

I'm assuming this is intended to say "...are not noticed..."?

[spring] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
Re: [spring] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-i… Peter Psenak