[spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization-01

[David Wright <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,



I support WG Adoption of this draft.


Thanks,

David




> *From:* [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 29, 2025 9:32 PM
> *To:* SPRING WG List <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-
> sid-list-optimization-01
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a three-week adoption call for
> draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization, ending on November/19.
>
> From the Abstract:
>
>    Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any
>    path.  SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions)
>    that represent a source-routed policy.  The packets steered into an
>    SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR
>    Policy.  An SR Policy can be instantiated SR-MPLS and SRv6 data
>    planes.
>
>    In some use cases, an SRv6 Policy's SID list ends with the policy
>    endpoint's node SID, and the traffic steered (over policy) already
>    ensures that it is taken to the policy endpoint.  In such cases, the
>    SID list can be optimized by excluding the endpoint Node SID when
>    installing the policy.  This draft specifies procedures to indicate
>    whether the endpoint's node SID needs to be included or excluded when
>    installing the SRv6 Policy.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ali-spring-srv6-policy-sid-list-optimization
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by
> the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or
> opposition -- this is not a vote.
>
> If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it
> explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the
> working group willing to work on the document.
>
> WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is
> whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and
> whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are
> particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not
> authors of the document.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bruno (for the Chairs)

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]