IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] comment on draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-00.txt

Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> Fri, 08 April 2016 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cbowers@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F48212D7E7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRpEs_o13xFZ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0759.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::759]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842CB12D711 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=k13iryjVZ96HnBQZ8GY+Ley3qrTrN0DuagkhW3MfYt4=; b=LLXbGh03WUHK2l2L55SNAVNiSIQO4C8QKAT0PfBo/6LyBUSQlKtZRQcEyQJajhZHz8nTZiiC0z2u0q5sp15ahTEx7CuNOg7AgELChTzm+fHIiuP3aaEBYPUO0pnzWpee1Mg4vlL7L9OWQ2538p34s03Y0TMhD0bHV6cNXzov0ZY=
Received: from BY2PR05MB614.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.148) by BY2PR05MB613.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.218.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.447.15; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:44:27 +0000
Received: from BY2PR05MB614.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.148]) by BY2PR05MB614.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.218.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0447.029; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:44:26 +0000
From: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: comment on draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdGRei3SbivypuFnTQaH2BFo593PjQ==
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:44:26 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR05MB6142EDCED9EF0A5186A66A3A9910@BY2PR05MB614.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.14]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d9ddbef4-cb22-480b-2859-08d35fab8525
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR05MB613; 5:n2ViWlCAhM+MYW3mzT3Ivgci0gh7+p+Oe8frKvtIDWS/Sbk4qLnuZFlxE5DrV1BYJfr1949KfPrv8af687jdlJCaq7aMfEYFo3sr9zfcAp73g3tKrhOvwqnZL66370cbDXHG1MROodeW9KFi3kFEtA==; 24:BTbfmxO2++rlx1vWqN0mOzcxM6uWV2CTvn32pA2zIcwycCxhQULMV1+dChD0+vCOOF8cUolIS9BNDwVA+moV3cmD0buyGr6hwhQh1gvg9EM=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB613;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR05MB6136DC9143145784AAA3323A9910@BY2PR05MB613.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:BY2PR05MB613; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR05MB613;
x-forefront-prvs: 0906E83A25
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189998001)(3280700002)(107886002)(110136002)(3660700001)(5004730100002)(2906002)(1730700002)(66066001)(2501003)(81166005)(19580395003)(74316001)(99286002)(5003600100002)(15975445007)(122556002)(230783001)(5640700001)(5002640100001)(92566002)(76576001)(1096002)(1220700001)(77096005)(3846002)(86362001)(102836003)(586003)(6116002)(450100001)(9686002)(164054004)(5008740100001)(229853001)(2351001)(2900100001)(87936001)(50986999)(10400500002)(54356999)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB613; H:BY2PR05MB614.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR05MB6142EDCED9EF0A5186A66A3A9910BY2PR05MB614namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Apr 2016 12:44:26.4879 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR05MB613
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/PN06crYXZDT2iUpqxboaLdIltEo>
Subject: [spring] comment on draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:44:45 -0000

Authors and WG,

It seems to me that this document should explicitly state how to handle prefixes and SIDs advertised with different values of the SR-algorithm field.  Here SR-algorithm refers to SPF or Strict SPF, and not the Preference Algorithm defined in this draft.

Presumably receiving two identical prefixes with different algorithm fields and different SIDs  does not constitute a prefix conflict.  It would be good to make the expected behavior explicit in the text.

Thanks,
Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email