Re: [spring] SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection

"Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <pcamaril@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084291200F7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=IbZpJ+c/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=BFbWr0DJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gp2upT5hf9N7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E9A1200F9 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:46:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16467; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1576756009; x=1577965609; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=et8+bBvTZD/oTdEEaV3uPXBY0ZwfUEp0CrKlTJuvInI=; b=IbZpJ+c/tqM6h5RxeBx0ZDCVrxQ4Jcpzjl9Z2GAbLvk6c+gYYrJCoa/+ WV1s8v3r6wQzWDf6fszawdSnLQAXEila3xyYB7dmXKYgQsVAQ7kkyMk76 LE7Sgd1MQoer4cSPcHlDLodcVIGcUClCM+pZKZMI6xRBP2becEy4k4GH7 k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:wAOudB+omKkcB/9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZR7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVdaOAEjyNv/uRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CFAQBCYvtd/4UNJK1kGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF8gR4vUAVsDkogBAsqhAaDRgOKc06CEZMmhGGBQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheCBCQ4EwIDDQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhV4BAQEBAxIRHQEBOA8CAQgOAwMBAQEoAwICAjAUCQgBAQQBEiKDAAGBeU0DLgGhWAKBOIhhdYEygn4BAQWCSoJYGIIMCYE2jBkagUE/gTgggh4uPoJkBIEuARIBPxaCWjKCLJA3hVaJYI8gCoI1lhQbmlGEQIoOmlECBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZ3FwFWUBgkFQGA2NEgwXg1CKU3QBgSeNKoIyAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,331,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="455977163"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Dec 2019 11:46:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xBJBkkQN008603 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:46:46 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 05:46:45 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 05:46:45 -0600
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 05:46:45 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SSSX5Nu3Y0PdrLzcuxk/6JwE/HzYmKzeZUx5Mku1HpFYxwOD4QeqD4H9rrkvNrfWgDH4Q2EpsxHVkR3csKlxovXX8v4jwwx6fiRYtlqR0jkxMGO2zZIFQHd0MElqvuO8KPAWeuAmGn+KNCAc9tAFnq8tnR+w+kR7NG1OYkU/5bAh8YpDzpz8METeYlqkbvWoNzewb/a/4pG4PQNez5xHys8hOhEmOfgjpd8J0cCrC0ndeRWtELR9XL2OrKjziumpMlD5NQQcHITVHyG2VC02tEd19mR4AvgxYg+wKlnWHxrYiioBvytWi1bbb3hupraO5XcL8oEAET4U45i9Y11XPg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=et8+bBvTZD/oTdEEaV3uPXBY0ZwfUEp0CrKlTJuvInI=; b=DQMNswmKSItnDt4hq40v8ICXyGAsSFiWptZ8JQwF9KsImVthDJ/8y2X9pHiHbyybV4T7ixsz20geGV4Pnz4AvgAeFozb/fvmvJGKNbwxJmRcEN3yP0pcWDp/9Iev3U+Y8VifWOFUAM+kIh5ZnQuis09a4Bu+uf6mjaE1mr4u89V6AjtPkntzMyNOjqU46MHbdlU8MF5dnO+MZM93MjIWLptDzExdTdSfsICEVhLtkwXFqJU8pURT/JaKa/b5rbpaJWqXYALqL0k7cvS9s/qCG4zuZ38BdBi+y/8gmc8bKfw+XGGKnAUGmz2MTTozh4vX+hAvg2F/0wfcszBHCakiQw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=et8+bBvTZD/oTdEEaV3uPXBY0ZwfUEp0CrKlTJuvInI=; b=BFbWr0DJuFN/2dkboDJAr6RmqGgU1QUzDj/8+AdElJnhjiqNgVxGOF6k1aKSdcABoT/W+AQxBRLwqnQVjn/+xGyfp44yqyP1Z2gzD3+mudhl/im5Q/ddKblLHiLpJ+Wy1bli8u2uH8rXJPygfR0uLSttuBThIgFP1Ej/IRDJLRo=
Received: from MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.169.234.8) by MWHPR11MB1262.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.169.236.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2559.15; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:46:44 +0000
Received: from MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b04b:c9bb:2378:7a8d]) by MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b04b:c9bb:2378:7a8d%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2538.022; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:46:43 +0000
From: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection
Thread-Index: AdWsUpFqnOxq4Hq5QDe4Hk89LCPZMgCb1hKAAAgZtqAB4gNCgA==
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:46:43 +0000
Message-ID: <9AA1E98D-9B53-428E-9C6C-EF339B0C65EC@cisco.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB56993795C0DA9AD3649F9BADAE5F0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <6F7156D6-4042-4D73-A17D-B27D97D9C5CA@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569965E0D376019C923102F5AE580@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB569965E0D376019C923102F5AE580@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.20.0.191208
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pcamaril@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:44da:1250:2dac:e1f3:236d:5679]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c1c614f2-d5e8-48ce-8d43-08d784791eda
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB1262:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB126295562C150EBF2BA57768C9520@MWHPR11MB1262.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5797;
x-forefront-prvs: 0256C18696
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(8936002)(2616005)(81166006)(81156014)(6486002)(36756003)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(66946007)(91956017)(76116006)(6512007)(86362001)(71200400001)(316002)(8676002)(110136005)(478600001)(2906002)(33656002)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR11MB1262; H:MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 4E/f5kh1md4Unu0YLHDcBcV+EvWbx6PiKYFUHqPZkvHtYMYD0hZYbE5IV+A9UGNpxj6fChvemDCZqNMm6+mb36UbHolLNSBa0rk3PM1yBy9uR0VxHjvnoxDID0ikJJEksMMJYdSGl9e3bi7S71OZyajEg1Lb5zRaRmSmQRTkYrfmfKVb1hb4HASD93lk5DUI1NVRqELTlN8Ib+CQ/N3y5mJFNVMqhuuwfdSGEGVbQw2tLVy6nlA/DpaUfIyXIjv1HPWJ4OWdZOjBJhwqciBnt/7lPzhKjk0E3pQA0A/Boq6Ds59d0gvAaYxc8LT8A7RAFg5zhK7KHq9wRgWogFTyMZ4QKnxjPuoVMq3t0q3Wokv0Qh6/JNrpZaXVHUBaE10BsCy5/sCjFh4x6LtsL1yIfiwwQVl0LhQensNCIq/jRzvpHsw73BsZEfSjdGCf+Sp6
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9AA1E98D9B53428E9C6CEF339B0C65ECciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c1c614f2-d5e8-48ce-8d43-08d784791eda
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Dec 2019 11:46:43.8643 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WdQ6J2R/zrRt0ydL9ESx7a7+aXV17Jrxry6O7HwK5/vp6D49hHn9d/v7628afuEYD9tmgCMsTPw1PQYDu44B/g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB1262
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/U8jXTJ1dwtOk-CNwDwMcIDmWB-Q>
Subject: Re: [spring] SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:46:52 -0000

Ron,

This is exactly the same as in the SRH.
There is no text in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming that changes this.

Cheers,
Pablo.

From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Date: Monday, 9 December 2019 at 23:48
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection

Pablo,

Section 2.2 of RFC 4443 offers two options. If you think that a SID is a unicast address, the first option is applicable. If you think that a SID is not a unicast address, the second option is applicable.

Which did you choose?

                                                                         Ron



Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com>
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 10:18 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection

Ron,

As you pointed out in your email, RFC4443 Section 2.2 is very clear about how to select the source address.
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming does not change this.

Thanks,
Pablo.

From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Friday, 6 December 2019 at 17:40
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>, 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>>
Subject: SRv6 Network Programming - ICMP Source Address Selection

Authors,

When an SRv6 node sends an ICMP message, how does it select the ICMP message’s source address?

Section 2.2 of RFC 4443 offers two options. If you think that a SID is a unicast address, the first option is applicable. If you think that a SID is not a unicast address, the second option is applicable.

                                                                     Ron


Juniper Business Use Only