[spring] Followup on my comments on draft-ninan-spring-mpls-inter-as-oam

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E023C120310; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.737
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZjvs9LhpoWu; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91ED912033F; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id v24so41327411ljg.13; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZmoDtmEYUYTTQBQZIJNifO38kv/TtxTd1lMckYEEQYk=; b=Mv/Wx304s4tyEAgCDiLK6wR7zh/i4GcXkw8uYA525ME/PinNJ+UHauF/I4zPrOuEUY EO7xoiYbzSxsF3PMdKDs6szR1Ru6yIHiA3wkqpIpjZrxPf/Q6aI0zehVkP6s948VQYXw ZGl9twH4/sVf4XRMAxRJ+WdYzOxyxOFfpfIKEjndrAcT+amxoF/esoU9t5OguaeBA54I 6owXS1AZ+11BuuXc+RrbYt4IfmvjoxXL4WanDNgKvG3s1UrK52eiegqI4eBbRVLfpkXZ EgAtZGD/PfYdGQHD5WgM2XpF77ZFOF7gXSJu+GsdFDN0DcKKjJobTd15HvcO3zF1DuTO fhtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZmoDtmEYUYTTQBQZIJNifO38kv/TtxTd1lMckYEEQYk=; b=EeSoMZhI6pbZQEe5F+mfpMJbnXIjNTlMAdDDhfPk1d0BLubNngPJw/bLWa1k5t82dY qAVA5rXOCEOAUu3xotRE6hKxk3rte79qFUmmSGA19sAkPD4nKMyQawRAm3i5l0roUjER 9cB/Sjti/FduzkOKfRqJzoMBVyvf053UNx6bvRy1ZSImWnR39BsCMFtpkQTf2b8oIPqJ ExfaBk9DM9fr97k4+/zwI3+LHmw8JkaynmsNHXSCjlVEtNNorLXiGZCTcfRkasnhSzQz 0g4EDia9EXR58t7xbk0i16WwbhXf19hVT9R/KOMjfa5hqHMe3wIG8k3hgu9R3yOgQ7UO sMpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUozxe0I+KO6CPVyuOlC3stiMNx/VKO5As32YqlUxNPMH9BWsk1 GH9UpXyCIX0MpXto5NFQWIWRCymHB5x/68pIdHehZhlp79k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYWoxcWTFp/Rhz0tfrfXQgUF+05nwhNHJMjqZ/Wbo4dxMuZy3r/gDvJuV2lqQ8dfJB2Bl0adI+0gYRkNVOt/s=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b047:: with SMTP id d7mr40474490ljl.8.1563892131346; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:28:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU=2awVmrucsO-ndP0T5eURjKBMCRgrZSm6eENGk=UwPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ninan-spring-mpls-inter-as-oam@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, spring <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4bd0c058e5a02cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/UnHY33EvOB4T6ddzfhvw94g4424>
Subject: [spring] Followup on my comments on draft-ninan-spring-mpls-inter-as-oam
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:29:05 -0000

Dear Authors, et al.,
I've wanted to continue with my comments to the draft you've presented at
MPLS WG meeting on Monday. As I've mentioned, please review
draft-mirsky-spring-bfd
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-spring-bfd/> and Section 4
Use Non-FEC Path TLV in particular. Welcome your comments, questions, and
hope we can work together on the solution of our use cases.

Regards,
Greg