[spring] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: (with COMMENT)
"Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 09:00 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4CB1A1E0B; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 01:00:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160204090020.4219.39450.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 01:00:20 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Y3wlBbLOAu34XEczd6XVf4YJ-_w>
Cc: pifranco@cisco.com, aretana@cisco.com, draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:00:20 -0000
Joel Jaeggli has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I find myself rather unsatisfied by The SPRING architecture SHOULD leverage the existing MPLS dataplane without any modification and leverage IPv6 dataplane with a new IPv6 Routing Header Type (IPv6 Routing Header is defined in [RFC2460]). in that the prospects for use of a new routing header, and ipv6 router/extension header treatment seem poor. and the potential consequences for chaining these for example seem worth exploring before electing that course of action.
- [spring] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-iet… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [spring] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)