[spring] Re: Call for adoption: draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05 (Ends 2026-02-02)

[Yingying Su <[e-mail]>]

Hello WG,

I support adoption of draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05 by the SPRING WG.

The document addresses a clear gap in specifying the association between SR Policy candidate paths and NRPs, which is important for consistent steering/forwarding behavior in NRP-based deployments.

Best regards
Yingying Su


> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Alvaro Retana via Datatracker" <[e-mail]>
> 发送时间:2026-01-20 01:55:24 (星期二)
> 收件人: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> 主题: [spring] Call for adoption: draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05  (Ends 2026-02-02)
> 
> This message starts a spring WG Call for Adoption of:
> draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05
> 
> This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-02-02
> 
> Abstract:
>    Segment Routing (SR) Policy is a set of candidate paths, each
>    consisting of one or more segment lists and the associated
>    information.  A Network Resource Partition (NRP), is a subset of the
>    resources and associated policies in the underlay network.  In SR
>    networks with multiple NRPs, an SR Policy can be associated with a
>    particular NRP.  In that case, SR Policy can be used for steering and
>    forwarding traffic which is mapped to the NRP, so that the packets
>    can be processed with the subset of network resources and policy of
>    the NRP for guaranteed performance.  Thus the association between SR
>    Policy and NRP needs to be specified.
> 
>    This document defines extensions to the SR Policy Architecture to
>    allow the association of the SR Policy candidate paths with NRPs.
> 
> Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
> of this Internet-Draft by the spring WG. Comments to explain your preference
> are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
> include this message in your response.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
> found at [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-jiang-spring-sr-policy-nrp-05
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]