[spring] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.txt

liu.yao71@zte.com.cn Wed, 28 February 2024 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31EBC14F603 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:15:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yF6rIhJaS7Yk for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B625CC14EB19 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 05:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4TlFFW4vQbz5B108 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:14:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 41SDElXx072535 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:14:47 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app07[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:14:50 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 21:14:50 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2aff65df31ca591-a062c
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202402282114506544794@zte.com.cn>
References: 170912571828.46142.5406900985583683355@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
To: spring@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 41SDElXx072535
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 65DF31CF.001/4TlFFW4vQbz5B108
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/dlWozJNyUAdMGyaXrvApQ_-6z2A>
Subject: [spring] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:15:06 -0000

Hi All,
We've submitted  a new draft draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem.
This document describes the problems for path calculation and function enablement without the awareness of aggregate header limit of the nodes in SRv6, and the considerations for aggregate header limit collection are also included. Aggregate header limit(AHL) is the total header size that a router is  able to process at full forwarding rate, for some devices, this limit is related with its buffer size and buffer design.
Any comments and suggestions are more than welcome.

Thanks,
Yao 


Original



Subject: New Version Notification for draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.txt

A new version of Internet-Draft
draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.txt has been successfully
submitted by Yao Liu and posted to the
IETF repository.
 
Name:     draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem
Revision: 00
Title:    Problem Statement with Aggregate Header Limit
Date:     2024-02-28
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    8
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem/
HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem-00.html
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-spring-aggregate-header-limit-problem
 
 
Abstract:
 
   Aggregate header limit(AHL) is the total header size that a router is
   able to process at full forwarding rate, for some devices, this limit
   is related with its buffer size and buffer design.  This document
   describes the problems for path calculation and function enablement
   without the awareness of AHL in SRv6, and the considerations for AHL
   collection are also included.
 
 
 
The IETF Secretariat