IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] IPR Claims related to draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh> Wed, 23 April 2014 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rjs@rob.sh>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3205F1A035C for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7jEmGtzaZIQ for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cappuccino.rob.sh (cappuccino.rob.sh [IPv6:2a03:9800:10:4c::cafe:b00c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA521A0345 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [109.144.246.125] (helo=[10.210.2.187]) by cappuccino.rob.sh with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rjs@rob.sh>) id 1Wcw9x-0002Ja-Ov; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:20:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh>
In-Reply-To: <CF479721.50869%aretana@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:20:16 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5388D290-F7F1-4D8C-9627-07E6CE616002@rob.sh>
References: <CF479721.50869%aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/eArc1Ssm4ZpQDLWcQGW-RLxpC4Y
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] IPR Claims related to draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:20:42 -0000

On 13 Mar 2014, at 21:10, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> In parallel to the WG Adoption Call for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending the results of the WG Adoption Call) until we have received a response from each author.
> 
> Note:  Given that the draft should be representing use cases, there is an expectation that no IPR is present.  If there is, the WG will likely ask you to remove any related text.

Hi Alvaro,

And again — sorry for the delay. I’m not aware of any IPR claims related to material discussed in this draft.

Kind regards,
r.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email