Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF0A128CFF for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dSYHjTeXOjSg for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A47C1289B0 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2718; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1495662621; x=1496872221; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KY3USW6cGLHj2KZvhfQRbGt1+rdOJn+7Op4dUBmbOmE=; b=iXDokdyHb1gfln7hq4ZgZ5SRB6CUrYKK0S75h1fOYatIEf/Rn3fxYMdn vA2YyaV5Idt4E5X2113DL3FGdP20yasWpwxVORTygzto3Tn0oRmrSlFJr tHP/3kLFYIc6EXeczX33EmhAPr+0pXhbSRVxSTe2GgiJ81BGlceAYz8fJ c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CYAAAG/yVZ/5FdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1VigQwHjgCRXJV3gg8hDYUsSgKCcz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBax0LhRgBAQEBAwEBODQXBAIBCBEEAQEfCQcnCxQJCAIEEwiKHg6wJYtBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYZfgV6DHIMihzQFniMBhx+Lf4IPVYRnijWUTQEfOIEKcRUcKoZ2dog1gQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,388,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="247338086"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 May 2017 21:50:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4OLoKD0005422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50:20 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 24 May 2017 16:50:19 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 24 May 2017 16:50:19 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHS1NbdC+8en3HHo0WSa3Oq28wlp6IEBF6w
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50:19 +0000
Message-ID: <ac7a8714715e452185b4bc7ba6a0e553@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <149566223716.8685.8429343804641347209@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149566223716.8685.8429343804641347209@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.61.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/fkLYWLu-uKBrcUVxOIWFlQzV7cw>
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:50:23 -0000

Folks -

This version is a significant revision. Changes include:

1) "Ignore-overlap-only" is defined as the standardized policy. Alternate policies have been moved to a historical appendix.

2)Some extensions to the use of "preference" have been defined to prefer IGP/SRMS advertisements over BGP advertisements

We look forward to your comments.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 2:44 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the
> IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Segment Routing MPLS Conflict Resolution
>         Authors         : Les Ginsberg
>                           Peter Psenak
>                           Stefano Previdi
>                           Martin Pilka
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 20
> 	Date            : 2017-05-24
> 
> Abstract:
>    In support of Segment Routing (SR) for an MPLS data plane routing
>    protocols advertise a variety of identifiers used to define the
>    segments which direct forwarding of packets.  In cases where the
>    information advertised by a given protocol instance is either
>    internally inconsistent or conflicts with advertisements from another
>    protocol instance a means of achieving consistent forwarding behavior
>    in the network is required.  This document defines the policies used
>    to resolve these occurrences.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring