Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01

[Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>]

Hey there,

 

So, it's over a year since Bruno asked this question, and eight months since
the current revision expired.

 

I don' see anything on the list, and there was no mention in the meeting at
IETF-118.

 

Can we have a status and plan, please?

It's OK if the authors have decided to give up on their efforts with the
draft, but unless the WG has also given up (it was an adopted draft) it may
be time assign new editors to move forward.

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: spring <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of
[e-mail]
Sent: 26 September 2022 12:52
To: Kamran Raza (skraza) <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]
Cc: SPRING WG <[e-mail]>; Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01

 

Hi Kamran, authors,

 

Thanks for the refreshed draft.

 

What's the status/ETA with regards to incorporating comments from the WG,
e.g. the ones below from Dhruv which are two years/revisions old.

 

Thank you,

Bruno

 

From: spring <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > On
Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 6:00 AM
To: Kamran Raza (skraza) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> ; SPRING WG
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01

 

Hi Kamran, 

 

Thank you! The most important thing to me would be to make the model work at
the device as well as the controller (an example that would be adding
headend into the SR-policy).  

 

Thanks! 

Dhruv

PS. Past comments I sent during adoption -
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/KzXFvavQxwkYLG6unN70JK0Mwno/

 

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 8:29 PM Kamran Raza (skraza) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:

Hi Dhruv,

 

The I.D will be refreshed and updated once submissions reopen.

Apologies for the extended delay in updating it .. 

 

Rgds.

 

From: Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:12 AM
To: [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]>
<[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >, SPRING WG
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01

Hi Authors/WG, 

 

The I-D in question expired last year! 

 

In fact, there has been no change since its adoption back in May of 2019.
None of the comments received during the adoption calls are handled -
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9Hy8jfOmVP9vmXXaSJ6mISwYCRM/

 

BTW there are various documents that are importing it -
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis?rfcs=1
<https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis?rfcs=1&show_subm=1&
show_dir=dependents&modtags=[e-mail],ietf-sr-policy-ty
[e-mail]&orgtags=ietf>
&show_subm=1&show_dir=dependents&modtags=[e-mail],ietf
[e-mail]&orgtags=ietf

 

Could we get clarity on the status of this I-D? 

 

Thanks! 

Dhruv

 

Orange Restricted

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.