IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com> Fri, 28 June 2019 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <chengli13@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863051201A2 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BYwHsU-bsAPf for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDB9120094 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3FAFB87B8C9D3DEDF064 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:46:31 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:46:30 +0100
Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:46:30 +0100
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:46:30 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.87]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:46:27 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
To: Rob Shakir <robjs=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr
Thread-Index: AQHVLK+zqgVLfP+gEU2kSWGBIkkrw6awS3OA
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:26 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0262B9FF@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAHd-QWt8m6TA6GghQwC5tyCU_rUzO2LhuJFgzmSAL9MQBxXuBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHd-QWt8m6TA6GghQwC5tyCU_rUzO2LhuJFgzmSAL9MQBxXuBA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.185.75]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB0262B9FFdggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/hb0KMVGNFX78Z1-6_mTZtpfkyUI>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:46:36 -0000

Yes, support. This draft is useful for scenarios where SFs support NSH and do not support SR,  and SFFs support SR, which is a common use case in networking migration from non-SR to SR.

Well , I think the details of the mechanism should be described in the future revision.

Thanks to authors’ contributions!

Regards,
Cheng



From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:14 PM
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr

Hi SPRING WG,

This email initiates a two week working group adoption call for draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr. This follows the discussion that we had in the last few IETF meetings, and particularly the focused discussion we had at IETF 104 regarding service chaining and SPRING.

Please indicate your support, comments, or objections for adopting this draft by Wednesday July 10th, 2019.. We are particularly interested in hearing from WG members who are not authors of this draft, and those folks that are willing to spend time working on this draft after adoption.

We are also looking for volunteers who can provide a technical review of the content of the draft at a later stage of its progress through the working group (e.g., before WGLC).

In parallel - we'll send an IPR poll to the working group and authors. The currently disclosed IPR can be found in the datatracker<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr>.

Thanks!
Rob & Bruno.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email