[spring] Reply: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths

Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com> Fri, 22 November 2019 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <huzhibo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E537120142; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:50:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vV2Gd0rNbIoj; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F173E1201A3; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:50:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C072EA7987C2DDFBF6A2; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 23:50:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.39) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 23:50:06 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM529-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.14.118]) by dggemm422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 07:50:00 +0800
From: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Reply: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths
Thread-Index: AdWhj5C+rGLfLm+dT2qnxncpj2IKRA==
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 23:49:58 +0000
Message-ID: <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAF479346@dggemm529-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.52.43.181]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAF479346dggemm529mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/j25v0uXj_xjw2EBOkdo10wvT24M>
Subject: [spring] Reply: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 23:50:12 -0000

Hi Shraddha:

   You say can keep forwarding plane longer. I don't know which stage of the forwarding state you are maintaining. The IGP determines the node fault by sensing multiple link faults. Because the nodes are aware of the link faults in different order, the state before the forwarding entry is deleted may be looped. Do you want to keep a loop state?

  And then,You say you can providing node-protection via anycast.I don`t how do you that, Any node of TE may be faulty. Do you want to configure the same Anycast address on the entire network?

Thank you
Zhibo

发件人: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Shraddha Hegde
发送时间: 2019年11月22日 11:38
收件人: rtgwg@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
主题: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths

WG,

This is the draft I pointed out that talks about solutions for providing node-protection.
It covers Anycast case as well as keeping forwarding plane longer.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths-05

Review and comments solicited.

Rgds
Shraddha