IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

"Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca> Fri, 01 June 2018 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=68370d176=daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4D1124B18 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 18:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WioDE6EhL5G4 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 18:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CORP-ESA4-Wyn.bell.ca (esa4-wyn.bell.ca [67.69.243.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E0B124B0A for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 18:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm5czo-d01.bellca.int.bell.ca (HELO DG1MBX01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca) ([198.235.102.33]) by esa04corp-wyn.bell.corp.bce.ca with ESMTP; 31 May 2018 21:53:45 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by DG1MBX01-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120b::8eb6:120b) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:48:59 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::e0f2:82d2:4ec2:f201]) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::e0f2:82d2:4ec2:f201%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:48:59 -0400
From: "Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy
Thread-Index: AQHT7Sl4g3dww3gTu0qldsC28eq1baRKuxeA
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:48:58 +0000
Message-ID: <E556DE65-14E4-482E-A09C-34653ACEAABD@bell.ca>
References: <CAHd-QWsZrcdJZnnJvDCpS_RqQ1e068FTUo0Rvh8s+C2zoiuy_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHd-QWsZrcdJZnnJvDCpS_RqQ1e068FTUo0Rvh8s+C2zoiuy_A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.24.25.8]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E556DE6514E4482EA09C34653ACEAABDbellca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/jN_LRf5Fn_ZACEejJYAhLfWTAUo>
Subject: Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 01:53:49 -0000

Support WG adoption

Also not aware of any IPR

Daniel Bernier

On 2018-05-16, 11:20 AM, "spring on behalf of Rob Shakir" <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of robjs@google.com<mailto:robjs@google.com>> wrote:

Hi SPRING WG,

This email initiates a two week call for working group adoption for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy. Please indicate your support, or otherwise, for adopting this draft as a working group item by 30th May 2018. We are particularly interested in hearing from working group members that are not co-authors of this draft.

As part of the discussions of adopting this draft into SPRING with the ADs and chairs of other WGs, there are a number of requests to the authors.

1. Please clarify in the text traffic steering with "SR policy" and its relationship to other traffic engineering functions. It seems to me that this work is generally describing how one selects and steers traffic into policies, rather than path calculation. Additional clarification of whether this is the case (or not), would be welcome to ensure that the relationship with other work is clear. We would ask the authors to consider whether sections 14.1-14.4 are required scope of this document.

2.. Consider what the core content of this document is, and how it can be make as concise and clear as possible. There are some specific suggestions that can be made here, but we would like to see this discussed with the working group.

Additionally, there are currently 17 authors listed on this document. Please trim this to <= 5 front-page authors, utilising a "Contributors" section if required for the others.. An approach to achieving this would be to list ~2 editors as the front-page authors.

In parallel to this adoption call, I will send an IPR call for this document. We will need all 17 authors to confirm their IPR position on this document.

Thanks,
Bruno & Rob.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email