[spring] Intended Status of draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Dear WG:

Haoyu Song is the Shepherd for this document.  During his review, he
proposed changing the Intended Status of this work from Informational to
Standards Track.  Here is his justification:

   Here’s the reason to support the standard type: the document describes
   standard procedures and protocol extensions for using STAMP over SR-MPLS
   networks. It specifies control and data plane interactions,
encapsulation
   methods, and interoperability mechanisms that require standardization to
   ensure consistent implementations across different vendor hardware.
Protocol
   extensions designed for widespread implementation and interoperability
   belong on the standards track.


https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EzMtFTSXO572dfHiiNi07hC9v0M/

Although he sent the message to the list, we haven't heard any other
opinions (besides Rakesh's, as a co-author).

We would like to hear opinions on Haoyu's proposed change.

Please explain why you might be in favor of, or against, a change in the
Status.

We will take opinions until Oct/15, 2026.

Thanks!

Alvaro.