[spring] FW: Progressing BFD in SR-MPLS work

bruno.decraene@orange.com Fri, 02 September 2022 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9770C1522A3 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wePGqQqKDOhE for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 23:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB181C14CE21 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 23:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar26.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4MJpNB400ZzFpj3 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:46:18 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1662101178; bh=Y2s82krAr61oN250QXLjTbJPgt7IPT7pEbwXTe4qFwY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Fb+6X6tbHwXtCcSBXwLnOsblJHRdYuCHbOdtT3mJ47Tvj040FN5nmK3VrREZTcPIw xmLf4t8yAdhuRhM9X0OXC33ry6CIjFAAxDXOwdrtpGTXF1H35yaAcfTkpfPR5ThkJf zZQTcrP3bfXagJLmh27J0B0e9ZH7pWthywHlOmb6YhL/aY+GNTK8ZeXzvWpv5p3qkB UPo5Wo7GNxkFT0da7WS1dyfPuz0bKsjUTJWqCZIdGwB2rpMY7zIl5AYjPWZfCXZB7Y PoejF0rWv97i5pv9zK1Y6D+K9GKjifCijeoA6RgkOgwYkO9yStVwjWl2R2pz8XhTyi wgYqALxG66vag==
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Progressing BFD in SR-MPLS work
Thread-Index: AQHYvkNWmTpm1BXxz0uqDuJN8lHaX63LskSg
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:46:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4972_1662101178_6311A6BA_4972_490_3_91bfc11ebc224073b78e1a7e263de324@orange.com>
References: <CA+RyBmVZ2ZAGhXb9jUv7B_6u5OMb3A4m1PxL60VtW0vDV7k3VQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmVZ2ZAGhXb9jUv7B_6u5OMb3A4m1PxL60VtW0vDV7k3VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SetDate=2022-09-02T06:46:16Z; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Name=Orange_restricted_external.2; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ActionId=ab5a54e3-3673-4b58-a5fc-3fb089998f39; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ContentBits=2
x-originating-ip: [10.115.27.51]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_91bfc11ebc224073b78e1a7e263de324orangecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/lpw-ft5hpk26T6CkYVvXdZxW3JI>
Subject: [spring] FW: Progressing BFD in SR-MPLS work
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 06:46:26 -0000

Forwarding the below email to the SPRING WG as it's very relevant to the WG.

From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:42 PM
To: spring-chairs@ietf.org; MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-bfd@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed@ietf.org
Subject: Progressing BFD in SR-MPLS work

Dear All,
I'm reaching out to you on behalf of the authors of two drafts, draft-ietf-spring-bfd and draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed. We greatly appreciate your consideration of our proposal, which may help progress both drafts.
At this time, draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed defines the Reverse Path TLV that, used in combination with the BFD Discriminator TLV, can be used to communicate to the remote BFD peer the identity of the path it is expected to use for the BFD control packets. That optional control is helpful in path-engineered environments, e.g., RSVP-TE LSP. SR-MPLS is another example of path-engineering, and the same method of controlling a BFD session is applicable. To achieve that, draft-ietf-spring-bfd defines a new Non-FEC TLV. Non-FEC TLV allows listing MPLS labels that construct the SR-MPLS path to be used by the remote BFD peer. Obviously, draft-ietf-spring-bfd uses the normative reference to draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed.
MPLS WG Chairs had discussed options to progress draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed. One of the options could be to move the definition of the Reverse Path TLV to draft-ietf-spring-bfd. As a result, draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed would be moved to the Informational track, and adding the normative reference to draft-ietf-spring-bfd.
We, the authors, believe that that can be accomplished before the IETF-115 and draft-ietf-spring-bfd be well positioned for consideration of the WG LC afterward.

We welcome your questions, comments, and suggestions.

Kind regards,
Greg (on behalf of the authors of both drafts)


Orange Restricted

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.