IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 30 September 2021 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D57A3A0AA7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 03:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8cygd-vw6tq for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 03:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2273A09A1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 03:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 18UAju5o002778; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:56 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED01D4604D; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17CC4604B; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:55 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (84.93.166.80.plusnet.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [84.93.166.80] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 18UAjsDe022379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:55 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Joel M. Halpern'" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, spring@ietf.org
References: <cfc0d02a-8931-14be-8768-e62f2ff0e5fa@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <cfc0d02a-8931-14be-8768-e62f2ff0e5fa@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:45:54 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0a4701d7b5e8$589ec800$09dc5800$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGwvY+aDRSnuSh01vg3WWivNmZIHawKUy3A
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.166.80
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.0.1018-26438.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.046-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.046-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.1018-26438.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.046400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: vEvJ7Rh1lGjxIbpQ8BhdbIA7SSmAp7NE1B5mjfppvWDX45MWooXn2Z56 Gkf9zccshunahIR1skvER1W7F71viO407XMquNtmAjoaSw0EjFVR3sGN+j7mNJhSCETaP5r50u5 faGP8ztSKbJjRgBP8qaPNT9pmq5xZUlU5OHHgV/EiJT2HHpbp5gYAPqHoVmYRqr3CBdU3C2BTVf MzxMuJPRAXfC5V+8UB0llFBGVRfOWMcUzJS3sH3ebfFBoHp0McHS44sLaHAPI3LFuQGPZCIIe+C wLSDva2wgLhAgqNvyd7hZpp8JbrBAFXmKyQ1CGnU3sFLicCFhVRwfT2oEaYdI2cB1+t/hletNfe wsmJeFaSgQ9/1HCvXARRh1IZA32y5UcZtwNsCro5f9Xw/xqKXSs3zPQeiEbe+gtHj7OwNO2FR9H au8GO7qfDnZdVcKQkfuDHcU+7M2Kq7xj9PH/LQX1PQFBj0e1C02hwZrWVEqU/A5R6AS8cdUMMpr cbiest
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/m-pgGDdKm6nrx-GNF_WCNFP5KW4>
Subject: Re: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:46:03 -0000

Hey Joel,

Stuff happens (TM)

This is OK with me. It is clearly in scope and something that the WG should
be looking at. This draft is a good enough starting point. Let's move on to
work on it.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 28 September 2021 13:08
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of
draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Oops.  The chairs declared adoption  of what is now published as 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection
> 
without a proper adoption call.  We suspect that adoption is okay with 
the WG, but we need to make sure. Does anyone object to the adoption of 
this document by the WG?  If there is significant objection we will 
determine what steps to take.  Remember that wanting changes in the 
document does not require revoking the adoption if you feel the basic 
approach is what the WG wants to use as a basis for work on this topic 
going forward.

Also, would the authors please confirm to the list that all relevant 
known IPR has been disclosed.

Please respond if you are an author or have concerns.
Thank you,
Joel, Bruno, and Jim

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email