[spring] New Version Notification for draft-ruan-spring-priority-flow-control-sid

"阮征(联通集团本部)" <ruanz6@chinaunicom.cn> Sat, 28 February 2026 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ruanz6@chinaunicom.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spring@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF89BC04C3EE; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:52:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78k2ytrFNFO4; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sendb.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendb.mailex.chinaunicom.cn [123.138.59.137]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9EBC04C3E5; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bg5.exmail.qq.com (unknown [10.172.147.156]) by sendb.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4fNJqb6294zqhWYH; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 16:52:43 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-mid: qylesmxpt1772268763tem8wm14u
Received: from LAPTOP-61IIMAR9 ( [10.2.113.8]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 16:52:42 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 0100000000000050J110000A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: GFecu540AxlBMAx2L50bXc6gTE69fYu8
X-QQ-GoodBg: 0
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 16:52:40 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.528[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2026022816523990796226@chinaunicom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart733425448128_=----"
From: "阮征(联通集团本部)" <ruanz6@chinaunicom.cn>
To: spring <spring@ietf.org>, rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: qylesmxpt:chinaunicom.cn:default:xx-kxq-mail.novalocal
Message-ID-Hash: BDLFWQ6IA6E25KPOFTZRCTBAXBPWVG4L
X-Message-ID-Hash: BDLFWQ6IA6E25KPOFTZRCTBAXBPWVG4L
X-MailFrom: ruanz6@chinaunicom.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-ruan-spring-priority-flow-control-sid
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/bNCr3nuNOorcA4uIluKh4L1sTb0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>

Dear all,

This is to inform you that a new version of the draft draft-ruan-spring-priority-flow-control-sid has been uploaded to the IETF datatracker, with the link as follows:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ruan-spring-priority-flow-control-sid/

 This draft leverages SRv6 policy’s explicit path orchestration  capabilities to extend PFC-based flow control to cross-DC WANs, enabling tenant-isolated, scalable flow control for RDMA/RoCEv2 traffic.

The core content includes

      1. Defining a new SRv6 Endpoint behavior End.X.PFC, an enhanced variant of the standard End.X behavior, used to identify PFC-capable interfaces in WAN and support the precise path-based delivery of PFC backpressure frames;

      2. Proposing two deployment modes for PFC backpressure signal transmission based on SRv6: controller-pre-deployed SRv6 tunnels and device-auto-triggered dynamic tunnel creation, to adapt to different WAN network deployment scenarios;

Key Revisions in This Version:

     In response to the discussions on the previous mail list, we have optimized and revised the draft content, mainly including eliminating ambiguous descriptions about the End.X.PFC behavior, and supplementing the detailed deployment specifications of SRv6 tunnels for PFC signal transmission, to make the technical solution more clear and operable.

Request for Attention and Discussion

     Given that the flow control mechanism defined in this draft is not only related to the SPRING working group's SRv6 technology system, but also has potential relevance to the research scopes of RTGWG, we sincerely invite all colleagues from the two working groups to pay attention to this draft, conduct in-depth discussions on the technical solution, and put forward valuable questions and revision suggestions.

We look forward to your feedback and will actively respond to and discuss all comments to further improve the draft.

Best regards,

RuanZheng




ruanz6@chinaunicom.cn