IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Juniper show-cased PSP and SRH insertion at EANTC

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Mon, 06 April 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA0C3A0B38; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ecx62-7aYqQV; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB453A0C27; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 08:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: spring@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 036Fq9uT094232 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:52:10 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
References: <676728C6-6BEE-4A5A-B570-5D78B943C6CD@cisco.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <729bad27-3b6a-4bc9-c9a9-ab81ff1b4039@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:52:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <676728C6-6BEE-4A5A-B570-5D78B943C6CD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nigxASfuZOerFeXkM3BEpxcLYdc>
Subject: Re: [spring] Juniper show-cased PSP and SRH insertion at EANTC
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:52:37 -0000

Zafar Ali (zali) wrote on 06/04/2020 16:37:
> We continue to see strong industry consensus on SRv6, Juniper show-cased 
> SRv6 functionality at the latest EANTC report, especially:

Zafar,

EANTC are an interoperability testing shop, so it seems unlikely that 
they're advocating for any particular technology.

Otherwise the video shows vendor support, not industry support.  There 
may be a case to infer interoperability or implementation status, but 
this video shows neither industry consensus nor deployment.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email