IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] [Pce] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9278C1A1B29; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 00:16:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOj5SY2uBFDC; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 00:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F761A9170; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 00:16:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1930; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446452172; x=1447661772; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zISXITe6lgMmnx5pTc3bONYmsrq2UmiJXp1Z6bIaX2Q=; b=lSj7SZe5f1tU7P7vib9FDpQ2OATzh9cj3NEcLCT5VmeUmNwfecbjzvib /8FhghJOXO0eo7fR1r4Nmf4cHhobD8WTwf28ng28yY9eXpKjvtEJwWeSl +BNLgH6f4efOYCEV+LNmV/e2ohKewcFTx9QvsHp8AbjdEp9N0w4pvZkkw Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AeAgCeGjdW/4ENJK1egztTbwa/NgENgVoXCoV4AhyBDTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDUBAQEDAQEBASAROgsFCwIBCBgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAQEEDgWIKAgNsEKQWAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARQEgSKFVYIQgm6HezGBFAEElkMBjSScOQEfAQFCghEdFoFAcoR3gQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,233,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="43000517"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2015 08:16:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (xch-rtp-008.cisco.com [64.101.220.148]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA28GA3u025538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:16:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-008.cisco.com (64.101.220.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:16:10 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:16:10 -0500
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00
Thread-Index: AdEUbsVrrzrcOCTPSMquLzMmIS+JkwBAd08A
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:16:10 +0000
Message-ID: <779EF7E7-FC53-4BE0-94E4-374618483A12@cisco.com>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA5EE97@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA5EE97@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.99.112]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <02C5900B69BE8946B0AEA5FD9DAB9FC2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/oZmKdgl17REF556WS2yK2stSQ_o>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" <msiva@cisco.com>, "Chenxia (D)" <jescia.chenxia@huawei.com>, "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] [Pce] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:16:14 -0000

I’d suggest you to have a look at draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-00.txt

Thanks.
s.


> On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> We proposes two drafts on the new type of segment in the segment routing: draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00.
> -- draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possible usecases such as reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or provide differentiated services. This document also proposes the difference between the adjacency segment and the tunnel segment. These work will help to understand the necessity and advantages of tunnel segment in some application scenarios. Then we define the forwarding mechanism and protocol extensions requirements on tunnel segment.
> -- draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possbile PCEP protocol extensions for the tunnel segment based on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00. The protocol extensions are introduced for two different applications: 1. PCEP extensiosn from PCC to PCE; 2. PCEP extensions from PCE to PCC. 
>  
> Hope you could have interest in these drafts, help review or refine. You comments will be appreciated.
>  
>  
>  
> Thanks & Regards,
> Zhenbin (Robin)
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email