IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] SRm6: Motivation?

"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE98B1208DE; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 23:24:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=cIHiNsMK; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=dR142si0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WazJx5eQtqEV; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 23:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6FE1208DC; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 23:24:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=676; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1574061868; x=1575271468; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4nx5tZ9lr+Cfy7g8Ijlg/POshRiv7c7CzWg7rwvnWk8=; b=cIHiNsMKtckat93m8q5T/7+RSsZ1R0R+y9DLPk4qAkFTO7R6pHs3GWeF 4l8ua0oVEBc8jz0OYga+7fN8Wygptu0k59ZO/rH4Dd4XFCkIIVLu2IThH LQKgCdOYG2vFz4o4sKu6hjandh8WzYsHsKY2k/TU4xhyBSp/eeQKpttqQ c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:F34hLBLsExLlnU/OE9mcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeCtKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXEH3Mf3ndAQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A5DADbRtJd/4kNJK1lHgELHIFzC4FLUAWBRCAECyoKh2YDinFOmhCBLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYZlJDQJDgIDCwEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhWooBgEBOBEBGiRCFxAEASYHB4MAgkcDLQEBAqJYAoE4iGCCJ4J+AQEFhQAYghcJgTaMFRiBQD+BEScfgwqEEYN2giyuLQqCKpVPG4Iul2OOSJoIAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFSOYFYcBVlAYJBUBEUkRoMF4NQilN0gSiMKQGBDgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,319,1569283200"; d="scan'208";a="365949794"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Nov 2019 07:24:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAI7ORiK018130 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:24:27 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 01:24:26 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 01:24:26 -0600
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 01:24:26 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gXuY3Hg2jpuuH/IpTSyHZBwbO8WE9oc5he1hsRCVlATAcKTLBmx8kqY5xqVktWUUObae1Yui4XgGuNEAFQx+G2/OMa+Erge4WZAohoZby9nSGI4SW/m74Y/GHKiAy18NqlekJOvi6QBP4LKga/7KSAyYYBw7toIPMZaBDJZDB9FKUVmGKnWBudcQ3N/xX/HqiQmPihbbV9xOY20OxaUlUHg0pqJtdGcJUNxEKxNRWM9Y4+I5XjfUGWl2Mu4hqKn8hQei+3pX0Ir/IsdNyxJ6ar+gS31QiXj38PCwChVrSRruPIEdoQv55eTElu6FwI4bqX9IwMJN3mfRJiGQuO55GA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1s7v3ujzxi8a5BK0OynkCAFR5hJSKydwLeDyGD/01k0=; b=GUXLK/maH0NS30Znswib0QtB1aM/qMlL34ve2JvfWPqEsO5AvAf7YUV4ZheAhBjaXsoczxgM9r1e/b93bvNWWON3rBwlj6SMKmrJzDMp/oXlQ1nPu1Wn2EerJ6tLG9EtTXGOZekyDhSOM51lUrXIzqMoegu05uW6d5oilEY/NgVI6tidydKY301fMEhRBfbeS294Bmfpcxa9hOSX9weainrH6/zsq9dbKPiavMji+h2YirFE1JHOfbTCgexJg3Y14sOo8HHUPD6izZn/QMd9/T9WDY88n/lHMUEx0TDiXXzUNjnA7JFQhS4wo4fonl+szLMAu7w7nHJY+AFKwSr8hA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1s7v3ujzxi8a5BK0OynkCAFR5hJSKydwLeDyGD/01k0=; b=dR142si0OfODGlIedsIx6BQRk1yJKBbAY9iCjzQCMz6LeCOkvCUaZF9BdwP2zspUm8ktIKyj01RhKqZ3JezemAoJn7+QCNZiSNpWMvAa8oXl9Uv6UYQzvbaGGeQ74HkusZT4PgYbChTxYXpYFQzJlcJ8fKJBLU1YrsmHykSn3Yc=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.246.159) by BN7PR11MB2820.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.246.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2451.23; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:24:25 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3]) by BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2451.029; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:24:25 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: "draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus@ietf.org" <draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus@ietf.org>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SRm6: Motivation?
Thread-Index: AQHVneE0qvZToEr+EEaqac0mKgSQzg==
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:24:25 +0000
Message-ID: <5FFFEEAB-A7B4-4DC9-92B5-30089546D96B@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ddukes@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [101.100.166.67]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 173c445a-22af-404b-144d-08d76bf8573c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2820:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB282067D76B213E5E815834B3C84D0@BN7PR11MB2820.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0225B0D5BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(6486002)(6436002)(81156014)(8676002)(6116002)(3846002)(66556008)(25786009)(450100002)(2906002)(186003)(305945005)(71190400001)(71200400001)(7736002)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(256004)(102836004)(86362001)(6506007)(26005)(2501003)(76116006)(91956017)(81166006)(486006)(99286004)(8936002)(14454004)(6512007)(66066001)(66946007)(4744005)(561944003)(5660300002)(2616005)(478600001)(33656002)(110136005)(36756003)(476003)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR11MB2820; H:BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: S5W/hhGVHvj1IDJyufTlY5Wf8UnnZq0vNzV4klDQ9fTTd/DsLSAM1iDSUT76kvznpcDmFucK2mjgz5S1dGOGlHM0W+cXm51gmz3kVa74XVvmHDQ9nUUCL2XufSPlkZBPUG6+BlJNit2Dxl/CN+mMcZ12+LxbtonDbw4MGXuDC3w04iN1ID8LDfO3uup6J/TsO3B3Y0banYtX1UUhFLA16ztScOW5Df14fjrA6bbsFA6X6GB3E/pkPbgnzWmpb42dJeu85vTsuvb5L4BgSzg7JAZE2NanIdu+Am1iF/dkoKqMeNZn3GO2qiZdSEDru/lBLkJInSQ+/IcWn+Pc7yHnhT9umYLzUSiHzmhM4iHfjkHTeRboaT7W5kjKyL9VFwsEc/EkVsz9iBQ2WFFRHHKE01VHckLTE9EgPvE1AX2OICDw30qtjBhNE/BsukwdBQjB
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B28FB5429CC5CF4CA229AB30C7E6D29C@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 173c445a-22af-404b-144d-08d76bf8573c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Nov 2019 07:24:25.4092 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OhYTbE56XaX9SRyf0QmDUMZGjG8w6EgQFXFkyg55TRhZjRafnqa46Y/MgodgQ8DEG0LdNIC1moDdAWUHm3oiWw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2820
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.23, xch-rcd-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/pQGMtbWfOFZSSPdfYsjc_1tnw-A>
Subject: [spring] SRm6: Motivation?
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:24:30 -0000

Hi Ron, to follow up on what was said at the mic.

The current community analysis, comparing existing solutions (SRv6 and SR-MPLS for IPv6) with SRm6, had the following result:
- a lot of differences (Architecture, Dataplane, Controlplane) and hence engineering cost
- scale, performance and complexity drawbacks
- no genuine advantage

Hence, the very first thing you need to do is to clearly compare your solution with respect to SRv6 and SR-MPLS and demonstrate why the above analysis is incorrect.

Only with such a logical analysis, will the community be able to judge whether this proposal should be pursued within SPRING.

Thanks
   Darren

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email