Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDE51294E0 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rpIxb8Ima18 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E8B126CD8 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3651; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1489479140; x=1490688740; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=jxwpudu51XNDOTsVy0XufNgpHdb4wxQPXb8tu9Td6mg=; b=gu1G9ajzd1P3u7zScLvbw9dvFgEdtnm1Q5NAWE/gwHqKPPv1yFrelOZz siz7EbIJ1X/iE9UkDHU2zhxWt5UoT74cYhHkHQgNO2oVJ77rIhHJYUiRW iXcf2+sMjZPBYntJMFpPOpM0sxbn+tOVPvL53C6CeK+IfolDn13LFelb+ U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ATAQB6pcdY/5FdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1FhgQoHjWaRUYgPjS2CDh8NhSxKAoJkPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUVAQEBAQIBAQE4NAkCBQcEAgEIEQQBAQEeCQchBgsUCQgCBA4FG4lNAw0IDq9phzgNgxwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdhk6CBYJqglGCA4M0gjEBBI9bjCw6AYZ1hxeELIF7VIRRg1WGMIpViG8BHziBBFgVGCkRAYR7gUp1AYhUgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,162,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="218241176"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2017 08:12:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (xch-rtp-006.cisco.com [64.101.220.146]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2E8CJlM013160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:12:19 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (64.101.220.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:12:18 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:12:18 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSnJqyPHB9y2/2RU27eqbmzemYEQ==
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:12:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4C798E8E-EF01-4B88-ADF2-8BE2B990E9F4@cisco.com>
References: <148942959391.9235.4676422773984365529.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN3PR05MB2706C7B0F310EBA26BA03652D5240@BN3PR05MB2706.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAEFuwkgJheR7RLt=DazjAe5n=cSY3Kj=wxaziJYfA=LxZRbVSA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFuwkgJheR7RLt=DazjAe5n=cSY3Kj=wxaziJYfA=LxZRbVSA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.85.200]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <79B696D52DD30444BAB357B1F4C5B889@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/rUUtyX6vw-dqLEb4GlAV8ZNbGnw>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com" <arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:12:22 -0000

Hi Pushpasis,

I agree. The problem/use-case is already described in RFC7855, the required protocol extensions are already documented in ospf, isis and bgp drafts, we already have multiple implementations, and deployments have been done.

s.


> On Mar 14, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Authors,
> 
> First I must admit that I have not read the entire draft in details... 
> 
> But from the abstract it seems that for the problem that this draft is trying to address, a similar problem is already addressed in the Segment Routing Problem Statement and Use-Case document (RFC 7855, section 3.3.1.1.1. Disjointness in Dual-Plane Networks). And the same has been solved using any cast segments as specified in draft-ietf-spring-mpls-anycast-segment. 
> 
> Request you to clarify why we need the solution proposed in this draft over the one proposed in draft-ietf-mpls-anycast-segments.. 
> 
> Thanks and Best regards,
> -Pushpasis
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> New draft submitted for "separating routing planes using segment routing".
> Looking for inputs and comments.
> 
> PS: The draft erroneously got submitted as individual and not affiliated to any WG but the intention was to submit it to SPRING WG.
> We will correct it once the submission window opens. Apologies for the inconvenience.
> 
> Rgds
> Shraddha
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:57 PM
> To: arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com <arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>; Arkadiy Gulko <arkadiy.gulko@thomsonreuters.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Shraddha Hegde and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing
> Document date:  2017-03-13
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          7
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    Many network deployments arrange the network topologies in two or
>    more planes.  The traffic generally uses one of the planes and fails
>    over to the other plane when there are link or node failure.  Certain
>    applications require the traffic to be strictly restricted to a
>    particular plane and should not failover to the other plane.  This
>    document proposes a solution for the strict planar routing using
>    Segment Routing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring