Re: [spring] About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH)
Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 15 June 2020 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CBF3A0D9A; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=pm3265tn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ZRsDohkh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xt-kErw6qgyv; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48FF3A0D98; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05FDrfEe012550; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:54:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=LqeRu8xGgThwHdR5NBnZSZ0vtWhFuttg9MyMR1lp22s=; b=pm3265tndxRm+s+Fv5Y1dIQRikWnYRIFKNNVZl2HTMZua+zuEVvtklA8UX0M6nc0iI9x Spr40hHFWAL+AzmCjpp+Ue2raAXybfnUcbxCjEuGORIXG/iO3neH/pJl/L92hdbZ63uv zbGznn3PaGJhGP8qSg2kkCRhjWFzBA3X/R+XPeErwR3PxTPrw/Av0MSeGU+7O1qv4hwP uhfGyGaezMuB3SY3L/zfjfSMMyo1ZL5Hfc6PZJo2sJow6xbjv/r3xNIojW2TuCBGro9p /OMmxoOprKvdNogl/Vnjy8iKBncaczE8wbAcym8kgpr52HNR/eVjboTKEz9jopuUi45E hA==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp2058.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.58]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31mx2n2sgw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:54:25 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mEj0A7Lgbq8QxhWfADIuMCOFfp8dZwfEiodSxye4NvWrWzCl+gOobbzjw8eHMAo7zxQ8gGuTYieiyema6cBYVP6xzrgT1RUu1vsGuTBh9uqB296gyvMA/PVYmYreoOVA/zu1AUyPNynO05WAsitYoNyJ0EVwJNC15Pw3bIP740TVkXz9XklfZpF7fNnDeZgQcGSHSjDDL4+8wr7OJeXpmQDis+QEI4soaQXcqL3gj+OBO3aJ+2SRe/rMLsU2sq9wiJVI3tA2UVZOCVEIg7lb0z+YuTQ9nvLk3TWkQqVDG8zZ7bvgYy8joZ2CymDWZC19wQNA6GkzicSIBLYsqnuu5Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LqeRu8xGgThwHdR5NBnZSZ0vtWhFuttg9MyMR1lp22s=; b=Ff2BNGkjnf2QpeTCSsUlUHRIWkmpPR4lNnwP72o1ZReYSL7UBcD6wuAzvF7fOTa8oLIblC2bVBZafV4dPCEtuMHB7as7tXUdq5ta+emXaloCVB1XxCJkxIcMX0sn9zBmFMshwyDC1UUN34ooK0WTZjsaT6TqSJ4gfKr7nKfufM3+4iSaAeWCW+sSLAbuUBvOrZKoIH1Vql76eY4cnSSmcG4e5Kda6snBam0kYKfnxDslDQAVzBITk8+ENImyMaVWNELY1gPkKoxFoi9hw0RpsC+g/P8Rc2BG73or7lIrKVeLOoQAkDmfSOY2QdN5lwOSai5KhF/tDRuHBpFhjmX9qg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LqeRu8xGgThwHdR5NBnZSZ0vtWhFuttg9MyMR1lp22s=; b=ZRsDohkh7YYcvyWbsWOm0Bb8CvbImtB3QZcSwMNgHghcOna5qQNVN2zcaLh26fd2vUTZlR8ImN8oHeetmWYD1Lmrtm3Iv5xnB7jx1uBBqNys3AsPj2u9oq+5IdWNPj0l6zry19JdY9it+FVcynklJ+Z7WSxB9SXOtHH9BrwmzfE=
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:122::15) by DM5PR05MB3628.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:3f::35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.11; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:54:23 +0000
Received: from DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d38:2336:1379:ce2e]) by DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9d38:2336:1379:ce2e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.018; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:54:23 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH)
Thread-Index: AdZCuMJHBVRRTak/QdaJrs+4Mzv0gAAAwI2AABg6IbA=
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:54:23 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR05MB634845D0CC14CB3D7A705D94AE9C0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <000001d642ba$b89f3480$29dd9d80$@chinatelecom.cn> <f677afa195154a97bd66e5c9688b8734@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <f677afa195154a97bd66e5c9688b8734@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-06-15T13:56:39Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=9c1c9af8-498f-4a5c-9a43-ac43e6ae3cfa; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.5.0.60
dlp-reaction: no-action
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2b7953ef-ddfd-4948-f6b0-08d811339c31
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3628:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3628D38095AD3BCA32ACDFF7AE9C0@DM5PR05MB3628.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 04359FAD81
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 8OcgkzXIF66QiaT+c9mIPLV0GqmE0bf6PvtmZEDr9tjagBUlicn40jLB8vgJ72tloH8C1Gp8rruAiu+p3Bz6scnTS6HaEFHFH4/vBWotHYyMFpb51zQfUUcq0zr53GN7nAsgRXbZzgBnq+pQ4uQ+1+Vmcr0nxRe9M9hi2TZASEv9CKWFm5lxGI7qx7Vk3zwCHzkW8XmshE9MNSfJTo2VNgS/gqOPdsmdGUBDjQ8R6UePSrdaO3BmXCZOHwCqGzANRaSbDHDbL9EzCX9KgjNQvpJFsZU70RPFVaBP/6QaEdvEZ+/fgSLMEIBLkYyDScKFg5xebYOeXpmAUsVVAT5Tr4eFuWU1NP2hqquXu2fh4npnJLr6LCfUakLJGOQBXY+CdYrhUBYM9zSuoksQujV+dw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(316002)(8676002)(33656002)(186003)(83380400001)(6506007)(55016002)(110136005)(5660300002)(53546011)(71200400001)(26005)(7696005)(52536014)(478600001)(9686003)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(76116006)(64756008)(66946007)(8936002)(166002)(86362001)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR05MB634845D0CC14CB3D7A705D94AE9C0DM6PR05MB6348namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2b7953ef-ddfd-4948-f6b0-08d811339c31
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Jun 2020 13:54:23.2890 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: sKNLD7Q5cUR/ErqODGCL7giDTuyyeTyrgSburZ20f5DJs8K8Zr+cQ5Rm/gQBNGRueU5Ng0NtXwjm9dNlIjRDAA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3628
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-15_03:2020-06-15, 2020-06-15 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1031 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006150112
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Fc5xo0ISWBbqSar9iDnLTsoN2EQ>
Subject: Re: [spring] About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:55:05 -0000
Aijun, Jingrong, Could the upper-layer header also be ICMP, as in a ICMP Echo message? Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Xiejingrong (Jingrong) Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 10:29 PM To: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>; ipv6@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH) [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Aijun, Very good catch! I think the 4.3.1.2 need to be updated ! I would like to propose some text (maybe later today) for RFC8754 4.3.1.2, as well as some other text in SRv6-PGM section 4.1 (and some related sections) I have observed about the Upper-layer processing for further discussion. Thanks Jingrong From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aijun Wang Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 10:14 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH) Hi, Folks: RFC8754(SRH) section 4.3.1.2(https://tools..ietf.org/html/rfc8754#section-4.3.1.2<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8754*section-4.3.1.2__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TQj3lWlbJi1xnhmD0skSC1Qbp_vkkYT77iE2zA_6hLItZqr8eZxbW1IoKhFgaBkD$>) describes the process of upper layer header as the followings: IF (Upper-layer Header is IPv4 or IPv6) and local configuration permits { Perform IPv6 decapsulation Resubmit the decapsulated packet to the IPv4 or IPv6 module } ELSE { ...... } And in network programming draft section 9.1(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15#section-9.1<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15*section-9.1__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!TQj3lWlbJi1xnhmD0skSC1Qbp_vkkYT77iE2zA_6hLItZqr8eZxbW1IoKiVOq5HR$>), one new Ethernet Next Header Type(143) is proposed. Although the detail process of this new next header are described in the network program draft, does it need to update the section 4.3.1.2 of RFC8754 to reflect the process of new header type(143)? Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom
- [spring] About the upper layer header processing … Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- [spring] 答复: About the upper layer header process… Aijun Wang
- Re: [spring] About the upper layer header process… Ron Bonica