IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Spring SR question??

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 23 June 2020 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F9A3A0A47 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfe7mjkQPTOL for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668AB3A0A50 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id t8so73199ilm.7 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ueYL2hMX8Zg3QKeG8aKJ28z5weAXiHDD3lz9PG0xpGE=; b=uuokWMbk5J3VaAhPEY+iRutDwRD2JjxQnkkMKz5hG5yaLu6+OiThK/XS1MCtt5pHr8 JAQPzhJg8gabItbLr64uP/gJksvUTN8/ryn+67tzqatUFZ7W0194J/Jo+RRrl+blRQTJ ZS2tnm78955AawbeRrRPtSymwEakaAMUqLCXZJmOCUi5Sqe++uYs+LLJoBZe7O7f8NMt HSnM4A40Rh3dQN7QZw6ljUrMoR/DpVOAoS91MOv01I07oKd/PA+m7/6rFAbsmGt2kKG1 rXXeGrbNSgkTajNL/17WjU1Pkut1FWAnitjEg2FQoK5J9qFysLu2nfuKeHWUztaq82hO qdJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ueYL2hMX8Zg3QKeG8aKJ28z5weAXiHDD3lz9PG0xpGE=; b=TS1NwOW2EjZ7RJbqpGQl6Xm7mgHVsfAYjX9/znwt8gGgCNXfs1uKYnCuRGkPoON8gj Bf1bxRzNr4uioCLSMk1lT+C/8ZRZQL8GOuUzd2RR5qBY/6AeoMa/I1sucywVG6Smpw1W FnorQ2t4XZniT1DxMV/HxgzWJga6VH2zLnxtmJPZQ5l+r/LgeCrbJgHAtz2ZystVTWDS 0BiAWYI9mzEL/kKIqwtVoEI+4ucB0xPsWTqRTMxguZRDoRC5hrtMwwN8nuQEMuGOPj5h KwpisZ1LJZM/EAwqZUndcuUNFVe0ILzaCR8Uk6LFllGqq14SXEwDAhFmVnRtAzpHpx93 Qm8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z6Km/dTlyP1ppRTWp9e7CEofNwXI0VXmzUdIbOF8IbJlnEryv hZcNJtJ+bv8TGb3wES2+YwR8nI9a1jUeSe39ruU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpfMZUjDfXjgWy81NCyuuYVdmlzJLfwGgl5AaxAXtwQZ+jUrWXAjEecD22aO8d4axjE6FuEzz/T0gT3SrJtqA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:d09:: with SMTP id g9mr25784973ilj.300.1592945545610; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV240-g+mUNwwyov=ycVL7hKS1n4kEEJPkee-ukyf=HDkQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB6348F66AF9526F18F3CF870FAE940@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB6348F66AF9526F18F3CF870FAE940@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:52:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2gqcuTU57r8SE0nAM6+FgdFo3vRi4AiyESrc71ab0dgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000648e3a05a8c6898c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/w4Zfr42s-xVp087EMYRx86H1AnU>
Subject: Re: [spring] Spring SR question??
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:52:32 -0000

Thanks Ron!

Gyan

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

> Gyan,
>
>
>
> You can signal SR-MPLS over a network that has IPv6 enabled, but does not
> have IPv4 enabled.
>
>
>
>                                                    Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Gyan Mishra
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:20 PM
> *To:* SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [spring] Spring SR question??
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
>
>
> All
>
>
>
> SR-MPLS utilizes IPv4 data plane and and can service v4 v6 edges  6to4
> softwire mesh framework from the VPN overlay aspect.
>
>
>
> Can SR-MPLS use IPV6 data plane?
>
>
>
> Reason why I am asking is that it is very simple to get from LDPv4 core to
> SR-MPLS core.
>
>
>
> However if you have an existing brown field SP core and your end goal is
> to get to SRv6 - how can you easily get there.
>
>
>
> So my thoughts are you can use SR-MPLS as a stepping stone so to speak to
> get to SRv6.
>
>
>
> To that end you could use Greg Mirsky draft of tunneling SR-MPLS in SRV6
> interoperability and use other inter operability drafts.
>
>
>
> But let’s say you prefer to get from point A go point B seamlessly and
> native naturally without any translation.
>
>
>
> An analogy would be migratory to IPV6 instead of using translation
> technology tunnels you dual stand the entire network and use ds-lite or LSN
> or 6RD to close the gap.
>
>
>
> So my thoughts on getting to the “end state” SRv6 are we follows:
>
>
>
> MPLS LDPv4
>
>
>
> MPLS LDPv6
>
>
>
> SR-MPLS v6
>
>
>
> Once you have a v6 core and you have decommissioned LDPv6 you now have the
> v6 data plan ready to go to get to SRv6
>
>
>
> SRv6
>
>
>
> Only caveat with this idea is I am not sure if SR-MPLS supports IPv6 data
> plane v6 label binding.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> Gyan
>
>
>
> --
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+%0D%0A+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.verizon.com/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Q4s7bsLfxzuPcWXIRDIeAIPQEmMceA3IXDq3kMe-U3ICOTolz45wy2DnuOsEl42h$>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions Architect *
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+%0D%0A+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g>
> *Silver Spring, MD
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/13101+Columbia+Pike+%0D%0A+Silver+Spring,+MD?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email