[spring] About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Mon, 15 June 2020 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870C23A0889; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZl5in4EZq-m; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m127101.qiye.163.com (mail-m127101.qiye.163.com [115.236.127.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89ADD3A0886; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m127101.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id C9FCF4630D; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:17:52 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: ipv6@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
References:
In-Reply-To:
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:17:50 +0800
Message-ID: <000501d642bb$2b481470$81d83d50$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01D642FE.396D9E60"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdZCuMJHBVRRTak/QdaJrs+4Mzv0gAAAi+dg
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VLWVdZKFlBSkxLS0o3V1ktWUFJV1 kPCRoVCBIfWUFZGR9JS00fQ0xLHxlIVkpOQklKQ0xPTEhLTUhVEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kWGg8SFR 0UWUFZTktIVUpJSVVKS0tZBg++
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6KzI6Mww4STg9QgkJCE0iFRdC FzpPFANVSlVKTkJJSkNMT0xITU5LVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUxCQkI3Bg++
X-HM-Tid: 0a72b5c4cc2d9865kuuuc9fcf4630d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/yI8mS3WUBg6PqG0-v0QMsW0hE6A>
Subject: [spring] About the upper layer header processing in RFC8754(SRH)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 02:18:05 -0000

Hi, Folks:

 

RFC8754(SRH) section
4.3.1.2(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8754#section-4.3.1.2) describes the
process of upper layer header as the followings:

IF (Upper-layer Header is IPv4 or IPv6) and

       local configuration permits {

     Perform IPv6 decapsulation

     Resubmit the decapsulated packet to the IPv4 or IPv6 module

   }

   ELSE {

   ..

}

And in network programming draft section
9.1(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-pro
gramming-15#section-9.1), one new Ethernet Next Header Type(143) is
proposed.

 

Although the detail process of this new next header are described in the
network program draft,  does it need to update the section 4.3.1.2 of
RFC8754 to reflect the process of new header type(143)? 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom