Re: [spring] FW: MPLS Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam-06

support. good solution for the problem in its scope though ultimately
relying on the deus-ex-machina all-knowing controller of the SR technology.
Nothing new ;-)

-- tony

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 3:32 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hey SPRING,
>
> Please be aware of this working group last call in MPLS.  Review comments
> greatly appreciated and should be sent to the MPLS list.
>
> Last call ends 9th January at 9am GMT
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 18 December 2023 20:47
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Gorup Last Call and IPR Poll on
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam-06
>
> Note well: I have inherited Loa's ability to type WGLC announcements 😉
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 18 December 2023 20:08
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam@ietf.org; 'Carlos Pignataro' <
> cpignata@gmail.com>
> Subject: [mpls] Working Gorup Last Call and IPR Poll on
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam-06
>
> Hi,
>
> == IPR ==
>
> Draft authors (Shraddha, Kapil, Mukul, Samson, and Nagendra) and
> Contributors (Carlos and Zafar), please respond to this email (on list)
> saying whether or not you are aware of IPR that applies to this document.
> If
> so, please state whether this IPR has already been disclosed in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> Please note that there are two IPR disclosures against the original
> individual I-Ds (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3937/ and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5234/), but no explicit disclosure has
> been
> made against this document.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR
> that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Mach, as document shepherd, will collate the responses.
>
> == Working Group Last Call ==
>
> This email starts a three week last call ending on 9th January at 9am GMT
> (an extended last call to cover the Festive period).
>
> We solicit all opinions on whether this document is ready to move forward,
> but we are particularly keen to hear reasoned comments with associated
> reviews.
>
> Mach, as document shepherd, will keep track of comments to ensure they are
> addressed.
>
> == Implementation Status ==
>
> While it is not a requirement (and implementations are not required), it is
> very helpful to know the present and planned implementation status of
> documents as they progress to IESG evaluation.
>
> Everyone is encouraged to report any implementation status that they are
> aware of, and the authors are encouraged to add an Implementation Status
> section to the draft per RFC 7942 even if that is just a note that no
> implementations are known at the moment.
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>