Re: [spring] My question at the mike about draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 November 2022 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA19C1522B8; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 02:33:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g34UFKkAnlMH; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 02:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa1-x2d.google.com (mail-oa1-x2d.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DFABC1522C2; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 02:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa1-x2d.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-13d9a3bb27aso14987925fac.11; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 02:33:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SI+2QyD3FjUwPEu+6v5gzZSCueTNJphGcLZSkwsvRXY=; b=mSSzw94Nzp/pyvD6GWR4HGcB5w7zzMPkRI/j4uB1jLFy6phgD7VjOf2syxIyh1THKf uH72bv3W9Q+ShH13mZaMaVtgugDFwCH8iEqvFCEaHJ78LdPrg+88wZuONywMKvf1AYqL N+NJ8LtJuLcQXPpvwyOwq4lpzact1o75UbofA8G2JsdQLtEMCDD/Yc3mG9oKDOITuQqy diYEf9uAahLwKEDvqqNrz3mFAI+EsZxRKL2ZRsivgWmYPceSpQUMwEOENbHIr1f5PE0I XgOAgNibWEz+huK5jUvYQiPc4tgcnU4z8ap4EdZ1yytfUZJ5yUYe+FBnse/vyBI3o9Se VhvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SI+2QyD3FjUwPEu+6v5gzZSCueTNJphGcLZSkwsvRXY=; b=V9AKlz6lDZtZIHYV2gZJzHAAymWfT/0LiVYSruOpuJx4i6Yg2t+vZpCG/Cdfoq130/ /v6JXR2zWEV7HqAeRmz88LmaT2O+2/IyqQoy8zWGzuJKA1BkudSOuYtY5lYz1F0Pyfwx Om8ZEEM4bhZ6RISNs3SamxY7mqMRHlTidRSCfegSw8MLYjxbt6b7W1gOOmS6OaH6a/3p VO7wu1pDGx3LNEKTKOAuesY+W6BTU7R8SPSu9CxJKJzmqMmgw3FmKUThWaWoDa8/6BU/ PelsVw+Xg1puz8dEkDQT3FQgqKEVGdHXfbY9AmCmimMpHRBpNR7RMOkqkai2QPgK8V1m KEzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3HBN9s52Yke3vT6eGRsE08i82rA/+uBsBDL9nrNr2xz/fiPB0L xA2vbSs32PGQWBb3pap+bAbW36vsImGfkSkD9VsUbZ9X
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM68lQi1VZipBgAVyMjx6KK4s3NIoSW+f7KV+NNJuX6uDpt8HZppEXZxYtsRqogy8Kn5wF9TUaag9cnTOOknGdY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:e885:b0:132:7840:b966 with SMTP id q5-20020a056870e88500b001327840b966mr631415oan.229.1667903580294; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 02:33:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR03MB6300015EEFE41D8CA8CFCAEEF63F9@PH0PR03MB6300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR03MB6300015EEFE41D8CA8CFCAEEF63F9@PH0PR03MB6300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 16:02:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPwh-69H9vq-W=HAAhw7OfH6XJ+b7-mkkBemRsRowN-AwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com>
Cc: "draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming@ietf.org" <draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, Michael Gorokhovsky <Michael.Gorokhovsky@rbbn.com>, Nitsan Dolev <Nitsan.Dolev@rbbn.com>, Rotem Cohen <Rotem.Cohen@rbbn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c544405ecf310b2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/zsYG9WVdLpESabtLfokwdbxENuY>
Subject: Re: [spring] My question at the mike about draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 10:33:02 -0000

Hi Sasha,

Your point is very valid and I assumed that the optical path is IP enabled
but there is no routing protocol running over it. There may be a mix up
between the terms L3 adjacency and IGP adjacency.

RFC8986 Section 4.2 End.X works for L3 adjacency (with or without routing
protocol running over the link) as well as L2 bundle members of an L3 LAG
interface. In all cases, the neighbor resolution and handling for IP
packets is expected.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:57 PM Alexander Vainshtein <
Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to repeat the question I have asked at the mike during the
> SPRING WG session today about
> draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming-04>
> :
>
>
>
> How would the node that has allocated an End.XU SID for a specific
> underlay link (i.e., non-IP) identify the Layer 2 encapsulation that has to
> be pushed on the packet with the End.XU SID exposed?
>
>
>
> The reference to End.X behavior in Section 4.2 of RFC 8986
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986#section-4.2> looks
> incorrect to me since End.X explicitly speaks about a L3 X-connect and
> usual Layer 2 helpers ARP and/or ND) would be applicable.
>
> But this is not the case for a path for a non-IP path IMHO.
>
>
>
> I may have missed the details of the response by the presenter, but my gut
> feeling is that my question has not been answered.
>
>
>
> Regards, and thanks n advance for the feedback,
>
> Sasha
>
>
>
> Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information
> of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential
> and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,
> disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without
> express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies,
> including any attachments.
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>