Re: [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST
"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Wed, 14 October 2020 07:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685C33A0EB4 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=YvKu13kY; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=jnHJ3W1S
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zj3mriTMjaa5 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFCB3A0EB7 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10583; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1602659579; x=1603869179; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=bg1tABTdiZfnTe8AHhjSbp6ji+tUajHHSjNXLx8vc/Y=; b=YvKu13kYJf45L5Q/lcLd/qtLuaYXTNwIf0Dwp/fqrRzQRJp09JHElyYS QnJllFgfBjF1VFTioN90abifbHqDnqUSfVpKWEauMoIj2EplKOsZVWu6U 8fFXTaov8pHl9NYo7PFAdCRIY219hm+Oj2IyFLGQ3r3AltT5i/ssJc+wl Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:UB8VxhC7owMQCV2KyE1zUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw30A3FWIzB4LRFhvbY9af6Vj9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH18AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7ep3So5ngTFwnxcw1vKbe9Fovblc/i0ee09tXaaBlJgzzoZ7R0IV22oAzdu9NQj5FlL/M6ywDCpT1DfOEFyA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CACACFpIZf/4MNJK1ggQmBT4EjAS5RB4FJLywKh3kDjVCUDIRvgS4UgREDVQsBAQENAQEtAgQBAYRKAoICAiU2Bw4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVwMhXIBAQEBAxIuAQE4DwIBCBEEAQEvMh0IAQEEARIIEweFA00DLgGdQQKBOYhhdIE0gwEBAQWFGRiCEAmBOIJyikQbgUE/gRFDgk0+glwEgSgBEgEjg0iCLZBdAol6nRUKgmqbD4MVni2TKYF7ni4CBAIEBQIOAQEFgVsLKGdwcBU7gmlQFwINjisXg06KVnQCNgIGCgEBAwl8jDsBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,373,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="562074348"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Oct 2020 07:12:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09E7CnNj011474 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:12:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 02:12:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 03:12:47 -0400
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 03:12:47 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FYuD36WEuPjA/iaLa4K3fgklfq3Wh3PiRSnZU432tShg3eS2s47tE649DkN5UjojiNs0SpGLlbKQ0Y3/ZqPfyVa8q7aWWHvgdDQm9RxM+yFGYS8UW2aHZuNdxWAwmw6ZFkxpt/d/ZqPRz3E7GRJV6iO25yPWi4iec6NqmbwelYyLigf81sUMrblvlis+1+lbT2pp6/L1eQdjAUfH6Z6oMt8A0KomDt6EAtqgH7gWBcmIEhpdWRk0N0/WesWOKlmBNoxLDzq0YgVHgI3EPVmxeJNmsi2vQ+1EWyAZ6NKv8rdRuH0rpyP0qRpT8UBhVCXJ+3fzxzO1NcJQbVi/S4I/Uw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8MaTcq11pPz5MY1n+x7HHxVvV22uozpvwf/xO9jWhrE=; b=bN/zRmVWn/IwcOv2BCk3t0KYysjhvTXb6bnDG97nRAr8nXhZ9HKxk+JikaIxPQmggvlNu6dOSsehgx59zKcRPWrmKHV+2D0bLX0EV/pKIF59KWaVMmlSi/1VlyqhwByDLlMb1AbE5R+JuBW+zfLPB+asl3S0j+Vy1RJvZl3j0HouFfy4eJe0sXPL1Zm8gduP+FEFThlYocEkzKTWxQCSEK0wmxnN3GhygRfNSKE6VqfNs52sHvpj0NYYz6e+r2Inlp1b1Kqtv82vEKJ6s10reBVDaG7a2g953tNmCxAsGyeGcFdJJLtHiB0oIvPTh93utYvNb5QB89+C6wCXZiNgwg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8MaTcq11pPz5MY1n+x7HHxVvV22uozpvwf/xO9jWhrE=; b=jnHJ3W1SmLxd/M+BnAgP0kIO4ia6UZkLCyC/DaesKV1Xw9+oK10dEakJR5yGELSlJn8hJ7IqrVVVRZWy0E31c2EBJ1uFwE6yxOCrbN6D1qf0dkw6wpiZKpVAHdJgfYaY+P/pdTqmAjj9eB+dn0ybMpsnhExd5X0rPsoyVh5ytGM=
Received: from BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:78::38) by BN6PR11MB4052.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:7a::37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.28; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:12:42 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d52d:a775:8f7c:f655]) by BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d52d:a775:8f7c:f655%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.030; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:12:42 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "srcomp@ietf.org" <srcomp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST
Thread-Index: AdahfBT60bVkxQrKR8eaRS0IFfTw4QAexUPT
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:12:42 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR11MB4081886548F5DDC4FFF84E18C8050@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB63482E9AF6942E6F008862C4AE040@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB63482E9AF6942E6F008862C4AE040@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2020-10-13T16:21:40Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=880863cb-77bb-4d7b-8366-b92a97189f4e; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2;
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [198.84.207.201]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 37127f11-66ad-49ba-33b3-08d870108acd
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB4052:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB405272784BF60999F070CC48C8050@BN6PR11MB4052.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ZmxgaVb8w5E7yx3XgusMSayBtDDNdEbP5CB9B1smqIOScdH1iaW63wrVb6mmL5mYhCLd67ZT91HJlQTjiFVVCzvkMo9yCkzDSvQEsDptQdM1hMPyW3HhfIGIQfnhLtSbfsdCSYT+dnW3NovSy/EoIMMPZzun61Kz4y+E0cS8PgMN3J2ziCydIZpDXCEvT/KIPe74+8wZKfnMfNmuGRF/Ta99DdWKuJEKynjbaQWM7Bb8qNhAp3B/MA8F88SDaRtbKZT5mtJ8L4D/LlTx/urZksAEGNZaKolS/D0eawIbDuV+iRE5mJ8GuX7PxK3oKa5RiAbSFvU4NrrfDe7VXgHCNQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(396003)(346002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(66446008)(86362001)(52536014)(66556008)(19627405001)(19627235002)(66476007)(5660300002)(76116006)(66946007)(8936002)(55016002)(64756008)(9686003)(8676002)(83380400001)(7696005)(15650500001)(478600001)(26005)(186003)(2906002)(316002)(110136005)(71200400001)(33656002)(6506007)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR11MB4081886548F5DDC4FFF84E18C8050BN6PR11MB4081namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 37127f11-66ad-49ba-33b3-08d870108acd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Oct 2020 07:12:42.1437 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Jqus3NXTirNMdhINLx+y2/cMkWRZwl9cnHRp14NI3XnSKQXuHVK6Ja1xzSS/IfC17biA5Rqd7EVpgZ3QII4haA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB4052
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/5SFVB5efAoMB3YAy7yn6X1G8p2A>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:13:02 -0000
Team, while looking at the other requirements in this section I believe this is a SHOULD, not a MAY... perhaps the other requirements for compression and fwd/state efficiency are really MUST. Below is a proposal reflecting SHOULD, and cleaning up Rationale (it was a bit repetitive) while adding the important segment list/path text to metrics. Changes in bold for your consideration, let's see if we can close this via email. Description: The compression solution SHOULD support a combination of compressed and non-compressed segments in a single path. Rationale: SRv6 is deployed today, in those networks support of paths with compressed and non-compressed segments improves compression without migrating all SRv6 nodes to the compression solution. A network deployed with only the compression solution may not realize any advantage. Metric: A compliant compression solution: * Can support classic 128bit SRv6 SIDs in the IPv6 Destination Address field * Can support segment lists (i.e., paths) with both compressed and 128bit SRv6 SIDs. Darren ________________________________ From: Srcomp <srcomp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 12:21 PM To: srcomp@ietf.org <srcomp@ietf.org> Subject: [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST Further REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST word-smithing happened and the result was: Description: The compression solution MAY support a combination of compressed and non-compressed segments in a single path. Rationale: SRv6 is deployed today. This requirement benefits networks that have deployed SRv6 before the compression mechanism was available and offers those networks improved compression on selected paths. It does not benefit networks that will deploy SRv6 after the compression mechanism becomes widely available. A network that has deployed SRv6 can achieve improved compression on select paths using a compressed segment without migrating all SRv6 nodes to the compression mechanism. Metric: A compliant compression solution: * Can process classic SRv6 SIDs (128 bits representing Locator, Function and Arguments) in the IPv6 Destination Address field NOTE: I have intentionally omitted SRH processing from the metrics. Processing Classic SIDs gets you much more function at much less cost. Juniper Business Use Only
- [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST Ron Bonica
- Re: [Srcomp] Update for REQ-8-26-HET-SID-LIST Darren Dukes (ddukes)