Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency
"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Wed, 09 June 2021 02:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E914D3A0C9D for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=NvyEu7nA; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=CuZcWFf8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8L0hRuMD4j_J for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F833A0C98 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=39593; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1623207504; x=1624417104; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=316SOtPoTag30qkb1eqRD33JA8DZVuC1Z8TDZMhbqig=; b=NvyEu7nAlciTFK30lePev7XYuaUsbE2RizspWUQpJXEPy/LRu1gCdASM K9teCyYFdktrYJc+0YZDyO0Oce+8rKgFpMRYhD0fSitBfNZ2mFBIE3loy Uo/LGOa/j86OYcC8rq8BWhK0mLck4bl30ykhxRR3xHkFtr0eq2EfXyvmo s=;
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:x2EjoBegcG8uMz/ZIzwLNgBalGM/VYqcDmcuAtIPh7dHaK/l/pn+MgrY//o+xFPKXICO7fVChqKWtq37QmUP7N6Ht2xKa51DURIJyKB01wwtCcKIEwv3efjtaSFpEMFLTlQj/nynPw5SAsmtL1HXq2e5uDgVHBi3PAFpJ+PzT4jVicn/1+2795DJJQtSgz/oarJpJxLwpgLU5aEr
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmCgC9LcBg/5BdJa1agQmBV4EjMFEHdw5MNzELiAUDhTmIdwOaF4FCgREDVAsBAQENAQE/AgQBAYRQAoF3AiU3Bg4CBAEBARIBAQUBAQECAQYEcROFaA2GRQEBAQQSLgEBOA8CAQgRBAEBIQEGBzIUCQgCBAESCBqCUIF+VwMvAZkZAYE6AoofeIE0gQGCBwEBBgQEhVEYgjEJgTqCe4QMhmMnHIFJRIEUAUOCYD6CYgSBKQESASMkEIMXgi6BWAEQHT4mSC8tXRUKTw8eAQEBAQ0kkUQHi0ONHpF/CoMcng8SpWSVUqQwAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFqJWlwcBU7gmlQFwIOjisFEYNOil5zAjYCBgoBAQMJfIk0AYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,260,1616457600"; d="scan'208,217";a="902234318"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Jun 2021 02:58:23 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1592wN3d017548 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 02:58:23 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.123) by xbe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:58:23 -0500
Received: from xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) by xfe-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:58:22 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:58:22 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TXojNEJJ4oFiU14/ykXpFzib/ttVYoryqx/BNOcUBdsWUb0D90CP2narVi9+rTpESv6nULv3FQreKKDnFN/gntU9qR8C/CTUVqLyp93VTyahj69rnHJP10OOnVRyXx2N7BC+gygsBXKhh7l6ULtzDsiUW5GfEbuKXR5uK1SAsMB3zpytB5TOo4CdR1UPZlgCUzkVBZxrQ682DmYr/rdnBUUNNoXzGfzj7xmsWzPrqV9WyD0hCpKMZTdPaMjb8I0vizHLJzDMJBdGt+GzYxIYlmUpABUZa9ROPRAHmRhsuxjw2cACHaQpJOosyClXQMOtNvpDOjHeDZcidht8GAMezw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BQFSZVy9fVXrYxr1Speq0AJx0WwiJAo/hBaPbqQUq5s=; b=LYVcbWzrnTxBl8oJsWUHqY6FGGumssavX3+m9l7QKYnCty3HAATazJS2P9MSVeQm3wfLxetm18lRVOypv2OYYEcUgBX/G0POt6zZ9FmwO4z4pMbcw+PQbsBjo2aMSel0vU2hUEZdi5+yXOF8bfoeAkW6uEqxHrJL07odY07pDVB/sXbbabc8tqTp5ItiBdtW66G8+LdE7gf3a+cZuqHvGlAvd0D9/wDM06n6UVQMnGXdZCeYyhXGOv4z9Q94jpleyWYJGUVSRp5eilBLyXz7wiqPCZ9HpMPz/ZvV7vmU6FiGGQiKMFTTk7yQfHPQQhQopiEZy9P/ZAJGzniqVd6WvQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BQFSZVy9fVXrYxr1Speq0AJx0WwiJAo/hBaPbqQUq5s=; b=CuZcWFf8gSqRb1PUu29mqofOt/9R3TzyxBTsyez1c93Q+Ifbuld6Jpd9m/LzDkHWQW8EJYNQdAxvjTG+aJ4XOd9uhJ4S5LThdDtB4v+kG0kXzbnediSBn14RhpfRmY6CTEv/lAAw0Yq8GBCzbOAQl5dobK0BZFPI3aOVPWVBgtA=
Received: from BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:78::38) by BN6PR11MB3905.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:82::36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4195.27; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 02:58:21 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e194:77e6:c748:8135]) by BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e194:77e6:c748:8135%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4195.030; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 02:58:21 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>, "srcomp@ietf.org" <srcomp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 2.3 State Efficiency
Thread-Index: AQHXUQxyCER6cCO8C0qSb/gcCcc2aqsAVNzggAE8bBCACVUi0IAAIL66
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 02:58:21 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR11MB4081ABAD11E367D0AC234AF7C8369@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN6PR11MB408134BE1B218CC0281D1361C8259@BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <ff0e9a164f2e414cabf18f4388e376db@huawei.com> <2a3d9e6bac5e47dfa7e46c48f6d16ad4@huawei.com>, <BL0PR05MB5316000CF7F6B1213FEF00BDAE369@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5316000CF7F6B1213FEF00BDAE369@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2021-06-09T00:17:34.0000000Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=2; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [198.84.181.169]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: acd184fe-5de8-4dbf-b1bf-08d92af270e1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB3905:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB3905B5DB16C44AD8191D9A4CC8369@BN6PR11MB3905.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(8676002)(66476007)(110136005)(76116006)(478600001)(55016002)(7696005)(33656002)(7116003)(52536014)(53546011)(5660300002)(66556008)(26005)(6506007)(2906002)(186003)(86362001)(91956017)(122000001)(83380400001)(8936002)(316002)(71200400001)(64756008)(9686003)(66946007)(66446008)(38100700002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR11MB4081ABAD11E367D0AC234AF7C8369BN6PR11MB4081namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB4081.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: acd184fe-5de8-4dbf-b1bf-08d92af270e1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jun 2021 02:58:21.2648 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OWUwd2mjOcG6k7g3G4OHKO3GpuVQDnPOGq1GKkZojDW1q5kjNEq6+zUVzjWhsJ/5kgKfLw7cvD6Qly9prBn83A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB3905
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.17, xbe-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/6mTgW2Um4aD9a7haXVMS8BExhe8>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 02:58:30 -0000
B.1, B.2, C.1 and C.2 follow the CRH appendix B final paragraph instructions. This paragraph requires the use of 1 (B.1 and C.1) or 2 (B.2 and C.2) SIDs to represent an adjacency segment. The operator has the choice to use either B.1 and C.1 or B.2 and C.2 in these cases to support the SRv6 adjacency segment functionality defined in RFC8402. Darren On 2021-06-08, 8:18 PM, "Ron Bonica" <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Cheng, At tomorrows meeting I will raise objections to B.1, B.2, C.1 and C.2. Each of them assumes that a network architect will choose to increase state as opposed to using two SIDs. Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Srcomp <srcomp-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:46 PM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) <c.l@huawei.com>; Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; srcomp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency [External Email. Be cautious of content] I checked again the analysis yesterday, and found out something may be wrong in the text. After discussion with Darren, we confirmed that. In the table8, the result of CRH in B.2 case should be (N+A)*I+2100=2200+2100=4300. So the 4500 should be modified to 4300. Ron, what do you think about this? Cheng From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 3:01 PM To: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; srcomp@ietf.org<mailto:srcomp@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Sorry for my late reply. I agree with the text in this section, at least for C-SID, VSID part. I guess it is ready to be added to the draft. Cheng From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Darren Dukes (ddukes) Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 10:26 AM To: srcomp@ietf.org<mailto:srcomp@ietf.org> Subject: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Below is the proposed text for section 2.3 for review. 2.3. State Efficiency The compression proposal SHOULD minimize the amount of additional forwarding state stored at a node. State efficiency is analyzed at an edge node and in a single sub- domain of the SR domain, where three parameters are considered: o N: the number of SRv6 nodes in the sub-domain o I: the number of IGP algorithms [I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo] configured o A: the number of local adjacency SIDs o D: the number of attached SR sub-domains at a border node o V: the number of VPN services at edge nodes For a sub-domain consisting of 1000 SRv6 nodes (N=1000) and some number of non-SRv6 nodes, two IGP algorithms (I=2), 100 adjacencies per SRv6 node (A=100), up to 10 attached sub-domains per border node (D=10), and up to 1000 VPN service segments per edge. o N=1000, I=2, A=100, D=10 o V=1000 UIDSR, CSID and VSID require the following entries: o a FIB entry for the local prefix segment, one per algorithm (I=2). o a FIB entry per local adjacency SID (A=100) **Note1 o At border nodes either: * A.1) a FIB entry per domain (D=10) to swap the IPv6 destination address prefix. * A.2) a 128-bit SID in the segment list of a packet, requiring no additional FIB entries. o At edge nodes, a FIB entry per VPN segment CRH requires: o a CFIB entry per CRH node per IGP algorithm for local and remote prefix segments (N*I=2000) * One FIB entry per node (N=1000) per IGP algorithm greater than 1 (per I>1) (N=1000) + IP Flex Algo requires a loopback address per algorithm per node - CRH assigns a CFIB entry per loopback o a CFIB entry per local adjacency segment (A=100) **Note1 * When non-CRH adjacent nodes are present, additional state is required for CRH as per CRH appendix B. + B.1) Up to one CFIB entry per node (N=1000) per local adjacency segment (A=100) per algorithm (I=2) to support non-CRH adjacent nodes in the sub-domain (N*A*I=200000). + B.2) Up to one CFIB entry per next endpoint if attached to non-SR domains and an additional CFIB entry per adjacency to support non-CRH adjacent endpoints ((N+A)*I=2200). o At border nodes, assuming two inter-domain links per adjacent domain for redundancy, (as per CRH Appendix B) either: * C.1) a CFIB entry per unique endpoint (N*D*I), per inter-domain adjacency (2) (N*D*I*2=40000) * C.2) a CFIB entry per unique endpoint (N*D*I), plus inter- domain adjacency (2) (N*D*I+2=20002) o At edge nodes, an SRv6 SID FIB entry per VPN segment and a CFIB or TPF FIB entry per VPN segment (V*2=2000) **Note1: there may be additional adjacency SIDs for protected, unprotected, and per algorithm adjacencies, resulting in some multiple of A. This is common for all proposals. +----------------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+ | 16-bit and 32-bit | CSID | CRH | VSID | UIDSR | +----------------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+ | S(N1000,I2,A100,D10) | *102* | 2100 | *102* | *102* | | | A.1: 112 | | A.1: 112 | A.1: 112 | | | A.2: 102 | | A.2: 102 | A.2: 102 | | | | B.1: | | | | | | 202100 | | | | | | B.2: 4500 | | | | | | C.1: | | | | | | 40000 | | | | | | C.2: | | | | | | 20002 | | | | S(V1000) | *1000* | 2000 | *1000* | *1000* | +----------------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+ Table 8: Forwarding State Conclusion: CSID, VSID and UIDSR minimize forwarding state stored at a node.
- [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency peng.shaofu
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Ron Bonica
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [Srcomp] 2.3 State Efficiency Ron Bonica