[Srcomp] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt, --about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence"

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Fri, 09 July 2021 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FB03A0D78 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 21:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71736NMNhsEJ for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 21:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0416C3A0D75 for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 21:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee160e7cd13339-ae2f5; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:14:12 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee160e7cd13339-ae2f5
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc (unknown[10.2.55.93]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee460e7cd12e76-77b97; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:14:11 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee460e7cd12e76-77b97
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: 'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 12:14:24 +0800
Message-ID: <03a001d77478$e708f360$b51ada20$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03A1_01D774BB.F52C3360"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdcmINJQxENJVm95SOCPlHgvRKttvBOV2TAg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/FqI6KFcbTVm4wdmj94h2KNgiPgE>
Subject: [Srcomp] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt, --about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence"
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 04:14:43 -0000

Hi team,

According to Chongfeng’s comments, we have got agreement on the minor change on draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement several month ago. 

 

Darren,

Could you generate a new version of requirement draft with the update according to following mail?

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

发件人: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Chongfeng Xie
发送时间: 2021年3月31日 19:27
收件人: Chengli (Cheng Li); srcomp
主题: Re: [Srcomp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt, --about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence"

 

Hi, Li Cheng,

I  think your revision is fine.

 

Chongfeng

  _____  

xiechf@chinatelecom.cn

 

From: Chengli (Cheng Li) <mailto:c.l@huawei.com> 

Date: 2021-03-31 10:57

To: Chongfeng Xie <mailto:xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> ; srcomp <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org> 

Subject: Re: [Srcomp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt, --about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence"

Hi Chongfeng,

How about this? 

I removed the “existing”, and using simultaneous deployments

 

 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06#section-5.1> 5.1.  SRv6 Base Coexistence

 

 

   Description: The compression proposal MUST support simultaneous 

   deployment with SRv6 networks.

 

   Rationale: SRv6 is deployed today.  A compression proposal that

   interoperates well with SRv6, as deployed, will reduce the overhead

   and simplify operations.  For Network operators who would migrate to

   compressed SRv6 SID lists, the migration is expected to gradually

   occur over a period of time as they upgrade networks, domains, device

   families and software instances.

 

   Metric: A compliant compression proposal provides the following

 

   o  Supports simultaneous deployment at a node with current SRv6 SIDs.

   o  Supports simultaneous deployment at a node with current SRv6

      control plane.

   o  Supports simultaneous operation of current SRv6 paths with

      compressed paths.

   o  Supports the behaviors in

      [I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06#ref-I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming> ].

   o  Does not require removal of existing IPv6 address planning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chongfeng Xie
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 9:24 AM
To: srcomp <srcomp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt, --about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence"

 

Hi,folks

I'd like to talk about requirement of "SRv6 Base Coexistence" in section 5.1.  The requirement is  described as "The compression proposal MUST support deployment in existing SRv6 networks." I think we should give a clear definition of "existing SRv6 network", some opertators have deployed SRv6, such as China Telecom,  if the software and hardware of the network equipment need to be changed to support compressed SRv6, it is not "existing SRv6 network" any longer, for it has changed the network itself.  If we stick to the current description of this requirement 5.1, I think NONE of the existing compressed slutions can meet this requiement, unless it does not change the network at all.

 

Best regards

Chongfeng


  _____  


xiechf@chinatelecom.cn

 

From: Chengli (Cheng Li) <mailto:c.l@huawei.com> 

Date: 2021-03-29 14:27

To: Weiqiang Cheng <mailto:chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> ; 'SPRING WG List' <mailto:spring@ietf.org> 

CC: 'srcomp' <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org> ; spring-chairs@ietf.org

Subject: Re: [Srcomp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt

Thanks Weiqiang!

 

Yes, I think the document is mature for WG adoption.  Let's nail it down, and then progress the analysis in parallel.

 

Respect,

Cheng

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Srcomp [mailto:srcomp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Weiqiang Cheng

Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:56 AM

To: 'SPRING WG List' <spring@ietf.org>

Cc: 'srcomp' <srcomp@ietf.org>; spring-chairs@ietf.org

Subject: [Srcomp] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt

 

Hi Group,

There were some comments on section 5.2 of draft-srcomdt-spring-compression-requirements-05 which is about the PS or BCP Compliance.

Design team had discussed the comments with group chairs. We believe it is about an IETF process, not a technical topic. 

So we removed the chapter and generated -06 revision.

 

So far, DT have resolved all the comments received and believe the draft is mature.

 

We would like to ask for WG Adoption call for draft.

 

B.R.

Weiqiang Cheng

 

 

-----邮件原件-----

发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 

发送时间: 2021年3月29日 11:36

收件人: Cheng Li; Chongfeng Xie; Darren Dukes; Peng Shaofu; Ron Bonica; Shaofu Peng; Weiqiang Cheng; Wim Henderickx

主题: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt

 

 

A new version of I-D, draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt

has been successfully submitted by Weiqiang Cheng and posted to the

IETF repository.

 

Name: draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement

Revision: 06

Title: Compressed SRv6 SID List Requirements

Document date: 2021-03-29

Group: Individual Submission

Pages: 16

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement/

Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06

Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-06

 

Abstract:

   This document specifies requirements for solutions to compress SRv6

   SID lists.

 

                                                                                  

 

 

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission

until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

 

The IETF Secretariat

 

 

 

 

 

-- 

Srcomp mailing list

Srcomp@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp

-- 

Srcomp mailing list

Srcomp@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp