Re: [Srcomp] The slides for presentation

chengweiqiang <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Sat, 24 July 2021 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B283A27A1 for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oe0NtWBg9YEo for <srcomp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F6B3A27AD for <srcomp@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.5]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee160fb833e436-6eafc; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:04:32 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee160fb833e436-6eafc
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com ( [117.136.0.196] ) by ajax-webmail-syy-appsvr03-11003 (Richmail) with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:04:31 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:04:31 +0800
From: chengweiqiang <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: rbonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "wim.henderickx" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
Cc: "ddukes=40cisco.com" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, srcomp <srcomp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2afb60fb6d07410-00039.Richmail.00006060147411019981@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_50465_1967758504.1627095871364"
X-Priority: 3
X-RM-TRANSID: 2afb60fb6d07410-00039
X-RM-OA-ENC-TYPE: 0
X-RM-FontColor: 0
X-CLIENT-INFO: X-TIMING=0&X-MASSSENT=0&X-SENSITIVE=0
X-Mailer: Richmail_Webapp(V2.3.07)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srcomp/YYdyTupOOyGpo5ShQ3JUW85uMX4>
Subject: Re: [Srcomp] The slides for presentation
X-BeenThere: srcomp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Compressed SRv6 SID Design Team <srcomp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srcomp/>
List-Post: <mailto:srcomp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp>, <mailto:srcomp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 03:05:10 -0000

Hi Folks,Thanks for comments.
Could we use following sentence instead:


"It is up to the SPRING WG to go next steps. The requirements and analysis can be used as input to that decision”


The sentence reflects the DT' goals.


Any comment?


B.R.
---------
Best Regards,
Weiqiang



---邮件原文---

发件人:Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>

收件人:"Henderickx,Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>

抄送:"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>,WeiqiangCheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>,"srcomp@ietf.org" <srcomp@ietf.org>

发送时间:2021-07-24 05:37:22

主题:Re: [Srcomp] The slides for presentation
 Do you agree that some requirements are more important than others? 
 If so, was is the harm in leaving the statement in place?
 
 Ron Sent from my iPhone
 On Jul 23, 2021, at 2:05 PM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com> wrote: 
  

 
 [External Email. Be cautious of content]
 

 
 
That was also my view, that individual people can bring this up, but for us to put that in the text is a bit odd. My 2 cents

 
 

 
 
From: Srcomp <srcomp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Friday, 23 July 2021 at 17:43 To: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>, srcomp@ietf.org <srcomp@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Srcomp] The slides for presentation

 
 
Hey team, I think we need to remove this sentence from Slide 17 before presenting the deck. “All requirements are not equally important. The working group must decide which are more significant.”

 
 

 
This presentation is about the analysis conclusions and not about requirements.  We unanimously concluded the requirements months ago, and the SPRING WG has reviewed them.

 
 

 
I’m fine to remove the sentence completely or replace it with something more relevant to the analysis and next steps...

 
“It is up to the SPRING WG to choose a proposal, using this analysis as input to that decision”

 
 

 
Darren

 
 

 
 

 
On 2021-07-21, 9:47 AM, "Srcomp" <srcomp-bounces@ietf.org> wrote:

 
 
  

 
Hi Team,

 
I updated the slides according to the discussion at the meeting.

 
Please check if the P9~P12 need to be updated, which provide some brief introduction of CSID, CRH, vSID and UID.

 
 

 
B.R.

 
Weiqiang Cheng

 
 

 
 
发件人: Weiqiang Cheng [mailto:chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com] 发送时间: 2021年7月21日 16:31 收件人: 'srcomp@ietf.org' 主题: The slides for presentation

 
 
 
 

 
Hi Team,

 
I prepared some slides as enclosed file.

 
Please review it and let’s have some discussion at today’s meeting.

 
 

 
B.R.

 
Weiqiang Cheng

 
 
 -- Srcomp mailing list Srcomp@ietf.org https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/srcomp__!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VNikXNYskekrVSh_GfGXDXO600pLh4rnA5-QNEPsz8pM_B9CK3fpSSl2nV3A750O$