[SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 (Ends 2026-06-02)
Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com> Wed, 20 May 2026 02:22 UTC
Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: srv6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: srv6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A385EF13CA5C; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1779243779; bh=hi1py/k4PPV7oD8/otGwZe6AMoDd/Abis/VC4dWPNu4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=vhBb0SAsz3QhNiLDv/EmQ1lgt5v4xro2vqfYEIytOFlnbD/K8UualvNDt3B/DjGxp lQjpxyARBpGcV+BG/GbwtWKSp//bGbjvZ2G5VctNj2cZZmeSQDtxgPN1zN8N56JpOG Htobra6AdrMNAWkJAOgkDAO5V/0D+fybU1kbiRsk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJuioatgzESF; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B61FF13CA56; Tue, 19 May 2026 19:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.83]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4gKwL14HxKzHnGdj; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:22:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapema100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.19.111]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAF840575; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:22:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapema500005.china.huawei.com (7.182.19.99) by frapema100006.china.huawei.com (7.182.19.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Wed, 20 May 2026 04:22:56 +0200
Received: from frapema500005.china.huawei.com ([7.182.19.99]) by frapema500005.china.huawei.com ([7.182.19.99]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Wed, 20 May 2026 04:22:56 +0200
From: Cheng Li <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "zali@cisco.com" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 (Ends 2026-06-02)
Thread-Index: AQHc5v7hIeXji4C53UKbElNQUwLfwLYWMPXg
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 02:22:56 +0000
Message-ID: <3194284ee3b2476985fcbd10925bdb91@huawei.com>
References: <177913349668.557208.2581503410373976317@dt-datatracker-7688897f84-l74h4>
In-Reply-To: <177913349668.557208.2581503410373976317@dt-datatracker-7688897f84-l74h4>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.110.117.133]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: Q2AKSGDHWSUHVQWH2FFMAETOWZDWL24H
X-Message-ID-Hash: Q2AKSGDHWSUHVQWH2FFMAETOWZDWL24H
X-MailFrom: c.l@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "srv6ops@ietf.org" <srv6ops@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 (Ends 2026-06-02)
List-Id: "SRv6 Operations (SRv6OPS) Working Group List" <srv6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/srv6ops/mqW3NwV52UpBjaFl7KyI4hZWmVc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/srv6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:srv6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:srv6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:srv6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:srv6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:srv6ops-leave@ietf.org>
I support the WGLC. This is an important work for SRv6. Thanks to the authors. Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 3:45 AM To: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security@ietf.org; spring-chairs@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; zali@cisco.com Cc: srv6ops@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 (Ends 2026-06-02) This message starts a Second WG Last Call for: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-06-02 Abstract: SRv6 is a traffic engineering, encapsulation and steering mechanism utilizing IPv6 addresses to identify segments in a pre-defined policy. This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 networks, including the potential threats and the possible mitigation methods. The document does not define any new security protocols or extensions to existing protocols. File can be retrieved from: Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping spring@ietf.org in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are highly appreciated. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-leave@ietf.org
- [SRv6OPS] Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Cheng Li
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Weiqiang Cheng
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… zengguanming
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Balázs Varga A
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Andrew Stone (Nokia)
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Joel Halpern
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… gengnan
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… 阮征(联通集团本部)
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Andrew Stone (Nokia)
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spr… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Suresh Krishnan
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Nick Buraglio
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Re: Second WG Last Call: d… Tom Hill
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Re: Second WG Last Call: d… Tom Hill
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Second WG Last Call: draft… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Re: Second WG Last Call: d… Tom Hill
- [SRv6OPS] Re: [spring] Re: Second WG Last Call: d… Alvaro Retana