[Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt

Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Fri, 29 April 2016 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405F312D0AA for <stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lctrt7L6CK3 for <stackevo-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell.ch []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7E212D0A5 for <stackevo-discuss@iab.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:10ec:52c8:8000::e9e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:10ec:52c8:8000::e9e]) by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21A6C1A093E; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:02:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D985273E-B7C0-440F-BB31-F849F4936957"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:02:14 +0200
Message-Id: <E6C9DB2D-6B71-4B65-BBDE-F48BCE92274D@trammell.ch>
References: <20160429143554.12437.85193.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: spud@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo-discuss/UAYNyjUBd8JOV1AytrQWwI1uivU>
Cc: stackevo-discuss@iab.org
Subject: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt
X-BeenThere: stackevo-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Discussion List <stackevo-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo-discuss>, <mailto:stackevo-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:02:48 -0000

Greetings, all,

We've submitted a new revision of the SPUD requirements document. This represents an editing pass over -02, incorporating some feedback we've had in the meantime, reorganizing some functional requirements to be more detailed, as well as making an effort to address all open issues with requirements.

In our opinion, this revision of the document represents a good starting point for a discussion about possible chartering of a working group for protocol work to meet these requirements.

Please send comments to spud@ietf.org.

Thanks, cheers,

Mirja and Brian, as spud-req editors

> Begin forwarded message:
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt
> Date: 29 April 2016 at 16:35:54 GMT+2
> To: "Mirja Kuehlewind" <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>ch>, "Brian Trammell" <ietf@trammell.ch>
> A new version of I-D, draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Brian Trammell and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> Name:		draft-trammell-spud-req
> Revision:	03
> Title:		Requirements for the design of a Substrate Protocol for User Datagrams (SPUD)
> Document date:	2016-04-29
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		18
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trammell-spud-req/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-trammell-spud-req-03
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-trammell-spud-req-03
> Abstract:
>   We have identified the potential need for a UDP-based encapsulation
>   protocol to allow explicit cooperation with middleboxes while using
>   new, encrypted transport protocols.  This document proposes an
>   initial set of requirements for such a protocol, and discusses
>   tradeoffs to be made in further refining these requirements.
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> The IETF Secretariat