IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Stackevo] meeting in Bangkok?

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 22 October 2018 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB7D126BED for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVQqSXWIxXzJ for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36AD4124BE5 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id w67so40373469ota.7 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uj3bC129sCcMo6DlPMGf6rvBeeXQ2Jrk5kWCGAw1wug=; b=ffn/FpllEHxZ9BzoUba2XtlC/tf620twn8x0RHpsNA5B8l+tokk03cDxAAY7M9ML3R dcvcpxW7YjnJHNe41i3ih+/OTiCqp7aht3D8oK19ahTLDhCeKmwwqRfOhi5SsasqstFQ RDStTxiwtCUi+9odgIhDbH6GEwtvO4qQdZM6mOcAlnot7NmEz8k3ID43DqP+Du9/LyRo 4ZtmfMjO+WZfaGrjjxCd2vIe0ziLQWjX9VcmyrrtPKynb0AGrLKpWgqYZOcZTElOQ7zB Z55cYreiSX/I18Do+hg334GlkILnghy6y6y6wrGxkOt2eIpxnNTarkRvdZZXF6RaOzFL 5HuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uj3bC129sCcMo6DlPMGf6rvBeeXQ2Jrk5kWCGAw1wug=; b=Qk2Hx5tJ8/FLUVLBWxDM8KsxiUbixlIAd7sNX+sz8HIGBAxgpdfXcegGG2QKDNLqoj 6qWRR6BYprMITuqaz/r29LC8DtUBciSIdr3pd/x7oSLxdNmjiXUQFWeycD8Vmft1m2LI Wf9eSohBJzNoiFFGmCc2thXF5ifr9O2cWOsNN2GxtKpzeYNZRnIIXrUbu652FMlj7uzJ PM43ZNBGEUP7Z9zJpUUNSqA/veYheEFtBX8VUFCEcar9+pxbsI8sDrL2u39oX49DpVlV IBSUnmcyLsKQEW8MSu1QHrEFqN10qm0H3i9Bb3voVLLD9eCZs2UvSRtrW7isLwMtNDP1 RpYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoh42U0MAC4II3ycxoPE8xbWiRRTetlUcKQSFMTiBDlsl3vQOwX4 5h8b0H2q/KtNTjqd25vV0TMGvEgtrRC+ZHJUscs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61nx8mIrZ5r1MDNuCC59CkJsw4isg5dJk75nzKNv3lg1nkx6qe19A+LtuMBF8LE37mAryAKcY6E0L9YuHujCQ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3284:: with SMTP id u4mr32077412otb.134.1540221563133; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2870481F-C1FA-4EA6-A7E5-D6FEEBD75298@trammell.ch> <F59C99CA-03AF-436E-99BC-3C22FFC44405@apple.com> <CAKKJt-eS5Y5ck9nSmDZT3xiD+VzadOaYf=XF-+ta+=ENU6Ax8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMD4bB5JCLw5THLoc5K06oB6YcWTDBDXudXJwoRvadZW7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fJph+C=U43kez_BKubh-XX6Wo7W9V_tGB0=eXX-x_PDQ@mail.gmail.com> <FE58B94A-7276-4789-A4BE-9063C2933351@apple.com> <65E804D6-8C15-420F-9F12-F9C4B3F14FE4@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <65E804D6-8C15-420F-9F12-F9C4B3F14FE4@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:19:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCo8rnzCEe44yRnjRMnqTCx3ST6AwoZoVoNZp2JH1gzig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025642c0578d2c749"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/eyajCjTPkHbMChbnzgDzfsTsqPc>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] meeting in Bangkok?
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:19:27 -0000

Monday and Thursday are the scheduled breakfasts, LLC is Tuesday, taking
over the IAOC slot.

Ted

Mobile/Terse

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:11 AM Mirja Kühlewind <
mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:

> Ted, when are the IAB breakfast meeting?
>
> I’m usually more awake Tuesday breakfast than Thursday breakfast, so I
> would go for that option if the IAB does not have a breakfast there…
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
> > Am 19.10.2018 um 19:35 schrieb Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>:
> >
> > Thanks, Spencer!
> >
> > So, it looks like the best options are Tuesday breakfast, Thursday
> breakfast, or Friday (late?) breakfast.
> >
> > If you have a conflict with one of those, please reply, otherwise we can
> just select one of those to meet.
> >
> > Best,
> > Tommy
> >
> >> On Oct 10, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Ted,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:17 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:03 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi, Tommy,
> >>
> >> The IESG and IAB are trying to figure out when we will actually have
> the Week in Review session that is usually after the last session on
> Friday. I don't know what the IAB is thinking (the IAB members would), but
> the IESG is supposed to talk about this on tomorrow's telechat..
> >>
> >>
> >> The original plan was to have it between 10:00 and 11:30 on Friday (so
> folks could either sleep in or have breakfast meetings), so that's
> nominally what the IAB is thinking.  I understand that the IESG is
> reconsidering after some questions on side meetings came up, but I asked
> Tommy to hold that slot aside because of the original plan.   If the plan
> shifts, this will need to get folded into the schedule planning.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the clues - and I wasn't sure what IESG discussion had made
> it to the IAB. You and Tommy definitely handled this correctly - I hope
> that was clear in my note.
> >>
> >> Spencer
> >>
> >> If folks are okay missing the WG chairs lunch, Wednesday lunch may also
> be a possibility.
> >>
> >> Ted
> >>
> >> So I'm all in for Tuesday or Thursday, and for whatever slot on Friday
> the IESG and IAB aren't occupying.
> >>
> >> Of course, meeting without us could be a bug, or a feature. Make good
> choices ;-)
> >>
> >> Spencer
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stackevo mailing list
> > Stackevo@iab.org
> > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email