Re: [Stackevo] Comments about draft-hardie-path-signals

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 December 2017 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DB412751F for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:58:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vtf0bvNBGw8S for <stackevo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F872127286 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m59so10969003qte.11 for <stackevo@iab.org>; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 09:58:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uxbyOVTaW/hLt7trxPCYh3EgCYcxs8PD3TbGe7UHaT8=; b=h+tZ/R7FudJbZePDraxp0oaRpFvwRAGfJuZt1xKQaKzdBf2FB2WGO66M7VrKaDvG7P 59iTuRsGnytNc4UdShoMx1VAP9rLl5TiNyJyAD7YZRAB290AHyPeC+ukvJ6UC6XUFW9v 991f/f47YFm5+73QSTAhSquw2SKgR8RkzCnZ5HkXGH7AOy0JPt8wiLvI73yaCUsf6p1k CckO5OQTmYo9ItUS8NXhIi5KOd0J+Hs7tBYDBSCC64OWn8OGmOqAEsLE9XxViaFJ3KWY zs2YIX4YL2rQjDHJj28zMBFPQip7zFdww3V+qMqprolVu06QHOHWt9qZkbAICC5iPDnq u/Xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=uxbyOVTaW/hLt7trxPCYh3EgCYcxs8PD3TbGe7UHaT8=; b=bhddd5aC0ztwiPgLej0Wk72w9FMkO6+3HoL9tzkXuQZYA9q2rtoIheW45eSCHnzmRa Miseyn8pW7NGnLna/bHK+JTcuvzy428V5+oCY5lGbljQTmkzOtD8wLAgA4tC0JtrB4JE CfVzQ4CVYzJOeRL6p2GSWcq3oFaArmdvIaRQNYApCrqV16BF+cylkYBjLkRWj1kEv86u 7vGSgV3KY6d0mK7VhCH58/kg2/7zcdcm9V1FfZP/JTyKBVDYEHMcwgUXB7R3px6sfWWs 81ha5pofhok74uQS2v9bMQU6qsLw4GOvVleWqXhM7xHQ8mCepb2x0VVfGugXWnniH7BM Zepg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLSNQCUEqx5hemydiUUs2GjQel89e60YLN7hnIEtn0hZIzKm03Y f0hgoJjgH7ECi4TtC7q36H2YUg9nxk4+O4D7neU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYVyDBAJuT1fRYJ1Asg1EL9yAuM+cQlewpowR0GA7YCtAJEsQC3ER+BbkkJZ1z96PpS9AAG9C8JJ8MCtmv1vWw=
X-Received: by 10.55.143.7 with SMTP id r7mr25930900qkd.318.1512583107011; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 09:58:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.36.169 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 09:57:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0870D5@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A0870D5@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 09:57:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCCry9GMT9C05dLLfsNM4yx+K32xNJz1y4wOTjyCZ5-Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Stackevo <stackevo@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c084c9ec969af055fafb244"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stackevo/rM4h-9a7YtCSxGu_YgaTtfeQlsw>
Subject: Re: [Stackevo] Comments about draft-hardie-path-signals
X-BeenThere: stackevo@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Stack Evolution Program Mailing List <stackevo.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stackevo/>
List-Post: <mailto:stackevo@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/stackevo>, <mailto:stackevo-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 17:58:30 -0000

Hi Med,

Thanks for the review; adding in the stack evo list, since there has also
been past review there.

You're right that this document does not focus on out of band mechanisms,
and I had not seen draft-penno-pcp-asdn-00.    I probably will not
introduce a discussion of it here, but I would be interested to know if
there are implementations and which IETF groups are discussing it.

I'm a little curious about the 3.1.x you proposed for Flow stability; are
there topics outside path preservation you see in that bucket?

By any chance do you have a reference for the terms "Endpoint dependent
filtering" and "Endpoint independent filtering"?

Thanks again for the review,

Ted

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:56 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Dear Ted,
>
>
>
> Please find some comments to this draft at:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/
> master/draft-hardie-path-signals-02-rev%20Med.pdf
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>