IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-stir-problem-statement-01.txt

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28C71AE348 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:48:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1V6fpaW2EtI for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576E11AE343 for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-173-71-10-88.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.71.10.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBGFmNru082487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <stir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:48:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <52AF20C8.8080809@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:48:24 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stir@ietf.org
References: <5B9321E4-CD56-462A-902A-C5D102563901@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B9321E4-CD56-462A-902A-C5D102563901@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 173.71.10.88 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [stir] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-stir-problem-statement-01.txt
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:48:25 -0000

One week remains in this LC. Please send any input you wish to have 
reflected as soon as you can.

Thanks,
RjS

On 12/9/13 1:12 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> The authors have posted an updated Internet-Draft on the STIR problem statement.  It can be found here: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stir-problem-statement-01.txt.
>
> Is this document ready for the STIR WG to pass to the IESG, requesting publication as an Informational RFC?  Please provide your input on this mail list by end-of-business on 23 December 2013.  If you have issues or concerns, please tell us what changes to the document are necessary to resolve them.
>
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status