[stir] Why mandate "orig" claim if not modified?
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 07 March 2018 08:09 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CDF126CC4 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:09:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5jEgMXBaXzce for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A01124C27 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 00:09:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1520410157; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RGAkdk8L/5uB7e5U0rP7j3aiTHwZf+U7jSamZs/g43E=; b=XxNHRPn9g6O8hhLxJ/PSWjNdjZJml5L6yTn22Mi0M+Ig1Ky8uL+i/jkT+RyV30Wg 1RPrf60bHbZtzYgrV8pwMR6HdP4nChqz8pgaJ7f7uUety202AbyaSrLXJ/RtIKEw OQoJae/yeCRsop67/E1ftZbh9dIjBAZo5zTIP/FlqRI=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-499ff70000005540-e2-5a9f9e2d3aec
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.54]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7D.74.21824.D2E9F9A5; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:09:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB109.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.82]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 09:09:17 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@team.neustar>, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Why mandate "orig" claim if not modified?
Thread-Index: AQHTteuWUtkptXk5YEGW3iLQYSKIkg==
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:09:16 +0000
Message-ID: <D6C56D52.2C3B5%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.7.170905
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6C56D522C3B5christerholmbergericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbHdTFd33vwog0U3dCw2P1vDZLF87TYm ByaPJUt+Mnm83jCHPYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSuja25twSH+ikf3TzI1ME7m7WLk4JAQMJFY /Mevi5GLQ0jgMKPE0w0n2bsYOYGcRYwSk/oUQGrYBCwkuv9pg4RFBIIk5v7uBysRFjCS2Ltg LStE3Fzi9tUWdpByEQE9iamruUBMFgEVic97E0EqeAWsJc582gpWzSggJvH91BomEJtZQFzi 1pP5YLaEgIDEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/+B1YsCTdxw4jY7RFxR4ur05VC9CRLLd0EczCsgKHFy5hOW CYxCs5CMnYWkbBaSMoi4gcT7c/OZIWxtiWULX0PZ+hIbv5xlhLCtJaZv+cuIrGYBI8cqRtHi 1OLi3HQjY73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJNjMCoObjlt+4OxtWvHQ8xCnAwKvHwnu6bHyXEmlhWXJl7 iFGCg1lJhHdyCVCINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I470lP3ighgfTEktTs1NSC1CKYLBMH p1QDY2Tmw0UmJ/xe1Bpf7DpmorpUdPO/JVXnJjPk2vXWXI/j37Z7zvI6JkW/yPrrRcqT16nt 5AvfV35xX0Skfe+ByP7vjFPnbbv17ugCb/P9mtPd/X53rBQ5G3eY82be+mm+tauZItkW7Y1t 19nHeVBX+9XpzrybosmN85bpclrpqaytnDv5Mfv+fUosxRmJhlrMRcWJAHWHyCiWAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/0tdhgecpnSv3Q3cCyNbPP0RrF-U>
Subject: [stir] Why mandate "orig" claim if not modified?
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:09:21 -0000
Hi, A generic question, but that came to my mind when reading the divert draft. Why does one have to include the “orig” claim in the divert PASSporT? It is already present in the “original” PASSporT, and it isn’t modified. There is probably a good reason, but I think it would be good to document it (or, if documented elsewhere, reference it). Regards, Christer
- [stir] Why mandate "orig" claim if not modified? Christer Holmberg