Re: [stir] Minutes for session at IETF 98

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF18129532 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXp7pVPuLPsb for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87951127201 for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEB630050E for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:56:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Kv7EBID-MIIr for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:56:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.16.149.222] (unknown [204.48.58.5]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 586D630050A; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:56:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <2d6af998-24c0-9d60-4831-c086f16c4fd9@yaanatech.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:56:12 -0400
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46CF1F92-B28C-4828-BB99-3C75DDF4B2F3@vigilsec.com>
References: <B61D0639-58D2-44F8-9445-FB37E2837B99@vigilsec.com> <2d6af998-24c0-9d60-4831-c086f16c4fd9@yaanatech.com>
To: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/7mSvxrxTTOxF_UKYaRh3ymxqsb4>
Subject: Re: [stir] Minutes for session at IETF 98
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:56:18 -0000

> On Apr 5, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Tony Rutkowski <tony@YAANATECH.COM> wrote:
> 
> Ah, could somebody clarify and explain this statement:
> 
>> - IESG had many comments about the certificates draft - Service Provider Codes - Coordinating with ATIS since they're the ones using all of the different identifiers 

Tony:

The TNEntry defined in the stir-certificates draft includes a CHOICE for service provider codes.  ATIS is the one that uses these codes.

Russ