Re: [stir] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8224 (6519)

Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Wed, 07 April 2021 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E152D3A2634 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LzEzPe5UEots for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [92.243.22.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226663A262F for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:648:8400:8e7d:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd] (unknown [IPv6:2601:648:8400:8e7d:d250:99ff:fedf:93cd]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C71CAE255; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:25:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: "fluffy@cisco.com" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "ekr@rtfm.com" <ekr@rtfm.com>, "jon.peterson@neustar.biz" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, "superuser@gmail.com" <superuser@gmail.com>, "chris-ietf@chriswendt.net" <chris-ietf@chriswendt.net>, "rjsparks@nostrum.com" <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20210406052047.50377F4079F@rfc-editor.org> <AM0PR07MB38602368B3ED807C9969F8DD93759@AM0PR07MB3860.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxtinuycq+QHamaPx9OJYY6ZTe8-Ki-7HdrHzR4sR_RTiw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c75e736f-58c4-0783-b37b-6be20231ecad@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 12:25:25 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtinuycq+QHamaPx9OJYY6ZTe8-Ki-7HdrHzR4sR_RTiw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/8-q9D6BRwRlP25JTIfSzYdNFuo4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:24:20 -0700
Subject: Re: [stir] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8224 (6519)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 19:25:39 -0000

Hi Roman,

On 4/7/21 9:18 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> Hi Christer,
> 
> This is exactly the issue. ATIS documents and other RFCs like rfc8946 use
> ppt with a quoted token.

Shouldn't the ABNF now be, to be compatible with non-SHAKEN implementations, this:

ident-type = "ppt" EQUAL (token / quoted-string)

> 
> Also, according to IETF 101 STIR notes (which you took), the ppt
> token value should always be quoted. I am not sure why it needed to be
> quoted (I think this is wrong), but that was the decision.
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:23 AM Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have not been involved in the discussions, so my apologies for asking
>> something that have been discussed already, but what is the reason for the
>> change? If you anyway are only going to allow "token" characters, why the
>> quotes? Is the only reason to align with how the parameter is used in other
>> specs?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christer
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stir <stir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
>> Sent: tiistai 6. huhtikuuta 2021 8.21
>> To: jon.peterson@neustar.biz; fluffy@cisco.com; ekr@rtfm.com;
>> chris-ietf@chriswendt.net; superuser@gmail.com; Francesca Palombini <
>> francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>; rjsparks@nostrum.com;
>> housley@vigilsec.com
>> Cc: stir@ietf.org; roman@telurix.com; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>> Subject: [stir] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8224 (6519)
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8224, "Authenticated
>> Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>>
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ac0542ba-f39e7bbf-ac050221-86959e472243-713aff0f88c18be4&q=1&e=6be2f688-f156-4c8b-953f-2bec6cf24d76&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6519
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
>>
>> Section: 4
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> ident-type = "ppt" EQUAL token
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> ident-type = "ppt" EQUAL DQUOTE token DQUOTE
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Based on IETF 101 STIR notes ptr= values should always be quoted. Also,
>> ATIS-1000074 is using double quotes around ppt value.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
>> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
>> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status
>> and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8224 (draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-16)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Authenticated Identity Management in the Session
>> Initiation Protocol (SIP)
>> Publication Date    : February 2018
>> Author(s)           : J. Peterson, C. Jennings, E. Rescorla, C. Wendt
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
>> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> stir mailing list
>> stir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir
> 


-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug