[stir] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-certificates-12: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 14 March 2017 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2EB12963F; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-certificates@ietf.org, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, stir-chairs@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com, stir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.47.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148950823366.30253.13647101230447134431.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:17:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/HmkaESlxH_3P9zt8DMb-BSeDONA>
Subject: [stir] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-stir-certificates-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:17:14 -0000

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-stir-certificates-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for handling my discuss points, esp about cert
status. I think it'd be great if STIR prompted work to
ensure better privacy for OCSP transactions as that'd
be a useful mechanism (in addition to stapling) so I 
hope that the further work envisaged here happens 
in the not too distant future.