Re: [stir] [IANA #1240945] Expert review for draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd (JWT)

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

FYI Mike is now at [e-mail] (cc'd)

I looked at the -23/-26 diff and don't think another review is needed.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:05 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Brian, John, and Mike (cc: stir),
>
> Version -26 of this document was just approved for publication. It looks
> like you reviewed version -23 seven months ago:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd
>
> Does this need another review? We'll hold off on making the assignments
> until we hear back (one response is fine).
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
> On Wed Nov 30 20:30:48 2022, [e-mail] wrote:
> > These registrations appear to be fine.
> >
> > -- Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >  From: Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 3:23 PM
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Mike Jones
> > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]
> > Subject: [IANA #1240945] Expert review for draft-ietf-stir-passport-
> > rcd (JWT)
> >
> > Dear John, Brian, Michael, and Chuck (cc: stir WG),
> >
> > This document is on Thursday's telechat agenda:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-23
> >
> > Does the new version (you likely reviewed -22) need another review? If
> > we don't hear from you before Thursday, we'll mark this version of the
> > document "IANA OK."
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Amanda Baber
> > IANA Operations Manager
> >
> > On Wed Oct 12 21:13:11 2022, [e-mail] wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > > On Oct 11, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Mike Jones
> > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please proceed with the registrations.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -- Mike
> > > >
> > > > From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 2:37:59 PM
> > > >  Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > >  <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > >  <[e-mail]>; Mike Jones
> > > >  <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > > > <[e-mail]>
> > > >  Subject: [IANA #1240945] Expert review for draft-ietf-stir-
> > > > passport-
> > > > rcd
> > > >
> > > > Dear John, Brian, Michael, and Chuck (cc: stir WG),
> > > >
> > > > We see that the JWT registrations in draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-
> > > > 21
> > > > were discussed and approved on September 15th, 2022 on the mailing
> > > > list at:
> > > >
> > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-reg-review/?q=draft-
> > > >  ietf-stir-passport-rcd
> > > > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jwt-
> > > > reg-review/?q=draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd>
> > > >
> > > > Do these registrations require another review, or are these okay to
> > > > proceed?
> > > >
> > > > The due date is Oct 25 2022.
> > > >
> > > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> > > > we'll make the registration at
> > > >
> > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/
> > > > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/>
> > > >
> > > > With thanks,
> > > >
> > > > David Dong
> > > > IANA Services Specialist
> > > >
> >
>
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._