[stir] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-stir-rph-05: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 17 May 2018 22:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3625612895E; Thu, 17 May 2018 15:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-stir-rph@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, stir-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, stir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152659695321.1530.2659397954219553276.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:42:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/UfmmhR5hXzGHwsz1tDueA4_jemI>
Subject: [stir] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-stir-rph-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 22:42:33 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-stir-rph-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-rph/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing my first discussion point and comments. I still have a concern on the second discuss point: §7.2: o The verification of the signature MUST include means of verifying that the signer is authoritative for the signed content of the resource priority namespace in the PASSporT." The authors explained via email that they expect this to depend on some ATIS work. I understand that such work is in progress, but has not reached the point of being citable. I don't want to see this document blocked on that work, so I cleared my discuss. However, I still think it would be a good idea to add some scoping text early in the document to the effect that this mechanism is intended for environments where some means of verifying that the signer is authoritative is available. (In addition to keeping the normative text in §7.2)
- [stir] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-stir-rph-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [stir] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-stir-… Das, Subir