[stir] Thoughts on SIPCOIN
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 11:56 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10D0127873 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=standardstrack.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNvVH0sx9PfM for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz221.inmotionhosting.com (biz221.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.223.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF11012420B for <stir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kMX2wDPLfc3eKcfSO+SMW9BQKSiod9iQ9ykd5zusuIo=; b=SBNnwiOwbnQQMwAeC6lUCnJkTB CBmNHS+9ea80IGNfhBdoFExcoBJf8jmHr0d3z8sd8+Z+AeiCsuyO5n7m4ZV+S+vwasVE1vY3u4f70 gjfad7PHZLtgEjsjvb07Bx3LaPREHqvY/I63Q76RrP8ab44kJtFsTAwPktKEuwPtux+o=;
Received: from [68.100.196.217] (port=56660 helo=[192.168.10.26]) by biz221.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1eyypw-00083L-Fp for stir@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:56:57 -0700
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C1AAA00E-A201-439D-82FB-5C9E21DA5BEC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <BB9B18B2-A36F-468F-9F46-E786273EB8B0@standardstrack.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:56:51 -0400
To: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz221.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: eburger@standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/b0lAJBpf30ToQVM-w6hDlyC-Kyw>
Subject: [stir] Thoughts on SIPCOIN
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:56:59 -0000
Would it not be easier for the national authorities to assess a $0.20/call tax? Kills the robocallers (per the draft), raises needed tax revenue, and (uh oh) annoys the vast number of regular citizens. I would offer the draft explains why voice call screening (most recently embodied by GoogleVoice, NoMoRobo, etc.) have 'solved' the problem. Identical economic approach for far less money.
- [stir] Thoughts on SIPCOIN Eric Burger