IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Questions about stir-certificates

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A878E13F8A9 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLsFlINEBiWr for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CA013F89A for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c202so1705352oih.9 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zLNyHfToP00vcVelFc+d5S2cfoV0p+8ckGvl48g/Imk=; b=u1kbohwaXzv0bq71QocYYrzGyAZP71WWlQ/Qvwph+wjdCEkmfbQi+BtVq8rUlFuMZU PvCIiT/xBjCwDt4ywjWxXYVT0KhDq/VsOKO99qPttBh+EqcB+vBoxkcMld0znKA3sIdj h24k3vvRVSG5hMHEzs/8kKCj1Ol1kBUp4JvczmsY4Z/DPcGNaOopWIg2D+4yvshVU34W O/Bn8KTaWO8A2YXtxelu/DVOLQ7JOMvctr2pOmgBssm/nA105cLqRc2iNleVfq5CAuMJ l+81FQp9gOGTLG0K1uzb3xHlM5lbVg/tTU0Fw9JawRY7GY2AD61V+nZjCBYWl7R2qzBE zCMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zLNyHfToP00vcVelFc+d5S2cfoV0p+8ckGvl48g/Imk=; b=E24T9LK5J7VxUQpCk8E+XvBymMkgbpJOulNZmn3fEw9A/NRYcnzdaBdF/T2KCH1Pvl gofe/KZCIfiWwRv+QXaqRup8c2C70K83DpjscmDlPkBEloIUb3MYshYPGojeQ8RCVx9J cCoZnhO7yuC9v+CiTuCSJ0UCV2djSeSTLpc+OmWcy3BfVis1HAT2ZZx1CUPEJkSpf8gX QeE0ACieZatqsCVow8vQwFwU4aLIQ8paEu9nTeLWDFXsI/6RCsyaejYtGs7dNGDfX0K+ KQQ3CNa74CcN2C6IMdws6ueVjj83ginSsf0SfwFkN56r4Xmisk7pax/d8I6ZG9LH5QTn I1iA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXUI2MMIyuFAXMvL7J6PdRmxaIZhDKFcFcJYdXT0vuJ2OQy4PEq a4Jv5g2HInnWtlXKwUIdGVnAvRg+S3z1pNOzvSeHuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SbtX4l82v/JCxgol1I0c47oa0AaWtDUNIU63sZRqH2/yTSUgoI3Zj2Mhxi3uTO0E4zM4oDsRcwLRGbYhGZOW4=
X-Received: by 10.202.75.216 with SMTP id y207mr2197246oia.282.1509509212846; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.72.178 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 21:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <37424273-bd3a-a2d8-856c-44ce58be720f@alum.mit.edu>
References: <D60E0087.1EEE44%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <CABkgnnV41djmwJ2A8WkLv1Qu_zxAKPb8EJnuoFS1Zeog3momyQ@mail.gmail.com> <E4972898-9912-456F-92E5-1A6022B26A85@sn3rd.com> <CABkgnnUNmwT_-atKHzOATOJ4SPhsC1+Gy0Q_6XLtGo7owgE-kQ@mail.gmail.com> <37424273-bd3a-a2d8-856c-44ce58be720f@alum.mit.edu>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:06:52 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXG8q1YBUTHCn=cGWxkQ_MyEvpqo-t8FScC4G0Zv0Bx8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: stir@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/ukDNXkqsybd0peJ_WuzZGGFy-fg>
Subject: Re: [stir] Questions about stir-certificates
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 04:06:55 -0000

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> What is supposed to be done for variable length numbering schemes?

I figure that you would simply have multiple ranges, one for each
possible length.  That might mean 15 ranges in the worst case, but
it's probably better than any alternative I can think of.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email